Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Luận văn thạc sĩ UEH determinants of capital structure of listed real estate companies in vietnam
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES
HO CHI MINH CITY THE HAGUE
VIETNAM THE NETHERLANDS
VIETNAM - NETHERLANDS
PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
OF LISTED REAL ESTATE COMPANIES
IN VIETNAM
BY
DO QUANG THAI
MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
HO CHI MINH CITY, DECEMBER 2014
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]
UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES
HO CHI MINH CITY THE HAGUE
VIETNAM THE NETHERLANDS
VIETNAM - NETHERLANDS
PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
OF LISTED REAL ESTATE COMPANIES
IN VIETNAM
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
By
DO QUANG THAI
Academic Supervisor:
NGUYEN HOANG BAO
HO CHI MINH CITY, DECEMBER 2014
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]
ABSTRACT
This research focuses on the impact of determinants to capital structure with
respect to 56 listed real estate companies in Vietnam from 2010 to 2013. Basing on two
theories of trade-off and pecking order, capital structure, which is defined by debt ratio,
is expected to provide the current prospect of Vietnamese real estate sector. The tradeoff theory mentioned about the establishment of optimal capital structure for
enterprises, while theory of pecking order implied the financing decisions by board of
managements.
For the methodology, Fixed Effect Model is used to test the results of regression
model. Non-random statistics of Fixed Effect Model would be more efficient and
consistent in order to reduce the level of bias. The data set will be arranged by panel
data, which combined both cross section and time series, helped to improve the
significant results of regression model.
Policy implications carefully mentioned about the limitation of both Pecking
order and Trade-off theories in Vietnam evidence. For Pecking order, board of
management prefers to use external financing budgets by issuing new bonds or stocks
rather than internal financing capital. The abuse of debt financing is also pointed out
the hard pressures on banking system, securities markets, and the corporate governance
structure of the listed firms. Besides that, Trade-off theory has limited its effect in
Vietnam due to centrally planned economy. The government needs to change its
administration in some listed real estate companies to create fair environment for the
whole market.
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I: PRESENTATION OF THESIS RESEARCH…………… 1
1.1 Problem Statement…………………………………………………….1
1.2 Research Objectives………………………………………………...... 3
1.3 Research Questions……………………………………………………4
1.4 Scope of study………………………………………………………... 5
1.5 Structure of thesis research……………………………………………6
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………... 7
2.1 Review of Empirical Studies…………………………………………. 7
2.2 Hypothesis of Variables…………………………………………….....11
2.2.1 Dependent Variable: Debt Ratio………………………………… 11
2.2.2 Independent Variables……………………………………………11
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY……………………......12
3.1 Analytical Framework………………………………………………... 12
3.2 Regression Model…………………………………………………….. 16
3.2.1 Assumptions of Regression Model……………………………… 16
3.2.2 Limitations of Regression Model………………………………...17
3.2.3 Equation of Regression Model…………………………………...17
3.2.4 Data……………………………………………………………… 18
3.2.5 Research Method…………………………………………………19
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS AND EXPLANATIONS……………………..20
4.1 Overview of Real Estate Companies in Vietnam…………………….. 20
4.2 Impacts of Vietnamese Real Estate Market…………………………...22
4.2.1 Inflow Capital to Real Estate Market…………………………….22
4.2.2 Land and Property Law………………………………………….. 24
4.2.3 Urbanization in Vietnam………………………………………… 24
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]
4.2.4 Economic growth rate (GDP’s Growth rate)……………………. 25
4.3 Descriptive Statistics…………………………………………………. 26
4.4 Leverage Testing……………………………………………………... 32
4.5 Results of Regression Model………………………………………….34
4.5.1 Multicollinearity Test by Correlation Matrix…………………….35
4.5.2 Using Wald-Test to Adjust Core Regression Model……………..36
4.5.3 Regression Model………………………………………………...36
4.5.4 Jarque-Bera Test for Normality (in Residuals)………………….. 37
4.6 Result Explanations…………………………………………………... 38
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS………………………………………….. 40
5.1 Summary of Research Methodology…………………………………. 40
5.2 Major Findings……………………………………………………….. 41
5.3 Policy Implications……………………………………………………41
5.4 Limitations…………………………………………………………….42
5.5 Further Researches…………………………………………………… 43
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………….44
APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………..49
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Expected signs of five related determinants……………………... 14
Table 4.1: Correlation matrix of debt ratio and five related determinants…..31
Table 4.2: T-statistic of debt ratio and each of determinants………………...31
Table 4.3: Leverage test of debt ratios……………………………………….32
Table 4.4: Results of regression model by FEM……………………………..34
Table 4.5: Regression model without DEBT_INTEREST………………….. 37
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: The Trade-off Model……………………………………………. 8
Figure 2.2: The Pecking Order……………………………………………….9
Figure 3.1: Analytical framework of capital structure’s determinants……… 12
Figure 4.1: VN Index and Real Estate Index from the period 2010-2013…...21
Figure 4.2: FDI flows to Vietnam from 2006-2013………………………….23
Figure 4.3: Number of Urban Cities in Vietnam from 1985-2012………….. 24
Figure 4.4: Vietnam GDP’s Growth Rate from 2004-2013………………….25
Figure 4.5: Descriptive Statistic of debt interest and debt ratio……………...26
Figure 4.6: Descriptive Statistic of depreciation ratio and debt ratio……….. 27
Figure 4.7: Descriptive Statistic of size and debt ratio……………………… 28
Figure 4.8: Descriptive Statistic of profitability and debt ratio……………... 29
Figure 4.9: Descriptive Statistic of volatility and debt ratio…………………30
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add [email protected]