Siêu thị PDFTải ngay đi em, trời tối mất

Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến

Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật

© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

The power of ideas : Intellectual input and political change in East and Southeast Asia
PREMIUM
Số trang
333
Kích thước
9.0 MB
Định dạng
PDF
Lượt xem
1689

The power of ideas : Intellectual input and political change in East and Southeast Asia

Nội dung xem thử

Mô tả chi tiết

THE POWER OF IDEAS

Intellectual Input and Political Change in East and Southeast Asia

Edited by Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer

This book brings a new approach to the study of political change in East and

Southeast Asia and demonstrates the importance of political ideas behind

policies and politics. The traditional approach to studying the politics of

a region is to focus on events, personalities, issues – the mechanics of the

political process. What this volume looks to do is to step back and examine

ideas and visions, as well as those who articulate them and/or put them into

operation.

The contributors thus aim to conceptualize what discourse means for

political change in East and Southeast Asia, and how ideas in discourses

affect political practice. As well as theorizing on the roles of intellectuals,

ideas and discourses for processes of democratization, reform and change,

the chapters also offer deep insights into the national and local, the general

and the specific situation of the selected countries.

Derichs and Heberer THE POWER OF IDEAS

www.niaspress.dk

THE POWER

OF IDEAS

Intellectual Input and Political

Change in East and Southeast Asia

Edited by

Claudia Derichs and

Thomas Heberer

Derichs_PPC_NEW.indd 1 9/11/05 12:39:00

THE POWER OF IDEAS

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page i Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

NORDIC INSTITUTE OF ASIAN STUDIES

NIAS Studies in Asian Topics

15. Renegotiating Local Values Merete Lie and Ragnhild Lund

16. Leadership on Java Hans Antlöv and Sven Cederroth (eds)

17. Vietnam in a Changing World Irene Nørlund, Carolyn Gates and Vu Cao

Dam (eds)

18. Asian Perceptions of Nature Ole Bruun and Arne Kalland (eds)

19. Imperial Policy and Southeast Asian Nationalism Hans Antlöv and Stein

Tønnesson (eds)

20. The Village Concept in the Transformation of Rural Southeast Asia

Mason C. Hoadley and Christer Gunnarsson (eds)

21. Identity in Asian Literature Lisbeth Littrup (ed.)

22. Mongolia in Transition Ole Bruun and Ole Odgaard (eds)

23. Asian Forms of the Nation Stein Tønnesson and Hans Antlöv (eds)

24. The Eternal Storyteller Vibeke Børdahl (ed.)

25. Japanese Influences and Presences in Asia Marie Söderberg and Ian

Reader (eds)

26. Muslim Diversity Leif Manger (ed.)

27. Women and Households in Indonesia Juliette Koning, Marleen Nolten,

Janet Rodenburg and Ratna Saptari (eds)

28. The House in Southeast Asia Stephen Sparkes and Signe Howell (eds)

29. Rethinking Development in East Asia Pietro P. Masina (ed.)

30. Coming of Age in South and Southeast Asia Lenore Manderson and

Pranee Liamputtong (eds)

31. Imperial Japan and National Identities in Asia, 1895–1945 Li Narangoa

and Robert Cribb (eds)

32. Contesting Visions of the Lao Past Christopher E. Goscha and Søren

Ivarsson (eds)

33. Reaching for the Dream Melanie Beresford and Tran Ngoc Angie (eds)

34. Mongols from Country to City Ole Bruun and Li Naragoa (eds)

35. Four Masters of Chinese Storytelling Vibeke Børdahl, Fei Li and Huang

Ying (eds)

36. The Power of Ideas Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer (eds)

37. Beyond the Green Myth Peter Sercombe and Bernard Sellato (eds)

38. Kinship and Food in South-East Asia Monica Janowski and Fiona

Kerlogue (eds)

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page ii Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

THE POWER

OF IDEAS

Intellectual Input and Political

Change in East and Southeast Asia

Edited by

Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page iii Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

Nordic Institute of Asian Studies

Studies in Asian Topics Series, No. 35

First published in 2006 by NIAS Press

Nordic Institute of Asian Studies

Leifsgade 33, DK–2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark

tel: (+45) 3532 9501 • fax: (+45) 3532 9549

E–mail: [email protected] • Website: www.niaspress.dk

Typesetting by Hurix Systems Private Ltd, Mumbai, India

Produced by Bookchase

Printed and bound in China

© Nordic Institute of Asian Studies 2006

While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in the Nordic Institute of

Asian Studies, copyright in the individual papers belongs to their authors.

No paper may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express

permission of the author or publisher.

British Library Catalogue in Publication Data

The power of ideas : intellectual input and political change in

East and Southeast Asia. - (NIAS studies in Asian topics ;

no. 36)

1.East Asia - Politics and government 2.Asia, Southeastern -

Politics and government

I.Derichs, Claudia II.Heberer, Thomas

320.9’5

ISBN 87-91114-81-0

Derichs_start-prelims.fm Page 4 Friday, November 4, 2005 10:28 AM

CONTENTS

Contributors viii

1. Introduction 1

Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer

2. Discourses, Intellectuals, Collective Behaviour and

Political Change Theoretical Aspects of Discourses 16

Thomas Heberer

3. The Role of Asian Intellectuals in a Globalized Economy:

A Commentary 36

Lee Lai To

4. Diffusion and Spill-Over Effects: Intellectuals’ Discourse

and Its Extension into Policy-Making in Japan 46

Karin Adelsberger

5. Bottom-Up Travel of Ideas for Political Reform in Malaysia 64

Claudia Derichs

6. Discourses on Political Reform and Democratization in

Transitional China 80

He Zengke

7. Discourses on Democracy and Political Reform in

Contemporary South Korea 98

Sunhyuk Kim

8. Political Dissent and Political Reform in Vietnam 1997–2002 115

Carlyle A. Thayer

9. New Trends in Chinese Thought: Economics and Morality 133

Olga N. Borokh

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page v Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

vi The Power of Ideas

10. Village Elections and Three Discourses on Democracy 150

Baogang He

11. Why Do We Look at Political Discourse in Vietnam? 166

Patrick Raszelenberg

12. The Discourse on Contemporary Chinese

Nationalism – An Alternative Reading 184

Gunter Schubert

13. Regional Community-Building in Asia? Transnational

Discourses, Identity- and Institution-Building

in the Fields of Human and Women’s Rights 202

Martina Timmermann

14. The Most Popular Social Movement in China During the 1990s 221

Edward Friedman

15. Chinese Professionals: New Identities and New Style Politics 237

Carol Lee Hamrin

16. NGOs in the Discourse on Political Change and

Democratization in Malaysia 255

Saliha Hassan

17. The Impact of Discourses, Institutional Affiliation and

Networks among New and Old Elites for Political

Reform in China 276

Nora Sausmikat

18. New Ways for Citizens’ Movements to Participate in

Political Discourse: The Case of Okinawa 300

Gabriele Vogt

Index 315

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page vi Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

LIST OF FIGURES

4.1. Classification of influence strategies 48

4.2. Different influence strategies 49

4.3. Channels for influence 58

5.1. Western scheme of idea diffusion 66

17.1. Parameter for diffusion of ideas 280

LIST OF TABLES

8.1. A Typology of Political Dissidents in Vietnam, 1997–2002 125

16.1. A Typology of Earlier Malaysian NGOs 260–261

16.2. Typology of Malaysian NGOs in 1990s 263–264

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page vii Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

CONTRIBUTORS

Karin Adelsberger is Assistant to the Managing Director for Seikoh Giken

Europe. In 1992–1997, she studied in East Asia Studies (focus: Japan and

politics) in Duisburg (Germany) and Seto (Japan). In 1997, she was an

assistant/secretary at Japan External Trade Organization in Düsseldorf

(Germany). In 1998–2000, she was a research student at the Faculty of Law

and Politics at the University of Tokyo (focus: Japanese reaction to

international crises in East Asia). In 2000–2003, she was a research fellow at

the Institute of East Asian Studies at the University of Duisburg (Germany).

For participating in the research project “Discourses on reform and

democratization in East and Southeast Asia”, her planned PhD thesis has the

working title “The diffusion of ideas into the policy-making process in

Japan”.

Olga N. Borokh is a leading research fellow at the Russian Academy of

Sciences, Institute of Far Eastern Studies (IDV RAN, Moscow). Her major

fields of research include intellectual trends in contemporary China with an

emphasis on western influences upon Chinese debates on reforms and

modernization. Her recent book is Contemporary Chinese Economic Thought

(1998).

Claudia Derichs is an assistant professor for political science at the Institute

of East Asian Studies, University of Duisburg, Germany. She has published

widely on Japanese politics and social movements in Japan in addition to

articles on nation-building and political Islam in Southeast Asia, particularly

Malaysia. Prior to her academic career, Dr Derichs worked as a science

journalist. Research: Nation-building in Malaysia, Islam and political reform

in Southeast Asia and the Middle East (comparative politics) and female

political leaders in East, Southeast and South Asia (comparative gender

studies). Teaching: Domestic and foreign policy in Japan, political Islam in

Southeast Asia and international relations in the Asia-Pacific.

Edward Friedman is a professor of political science at the University of

Wisconsin, Madison, where he teaches courses on the Politics of Human

Rights, Challenges of Democratization, Revolution, and Chinese Politics. His

recent books include Chinese Village, Socialist State (Yale, 1991), The Politics of

Democratization: Generalizing East Asian Experiences (1994), National Identity

and Democratic Prospects in Socialist China (1995) and What if China doesn't

Democratize? Implications for War and Peace (2000). Revolution, Resistance and

Reform in Village China (Yale) is forthcoming.

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page viii Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

Contributors ix

Carol Lee Hamrin is a Chinese affairs consultant, as well as a research

professor at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, where she is

working with the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution (ICAR) and

the Center for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (CAPEC). She also serves

as a Senior Associate with several non-profit organizations supporting

research and social services in China. Carol was the senior China research

specialist at the Department of State for 25 years, and has taught at The Johns

Hopkins University (School of Advanced International Studies). She has

published several books, including Decision-making in Deng’s China and

China and the Challenge of the Future, and many book chapters and journal

articles. Dr Hamrin’s current research interests include the development of

the non-profit, non-governmental sector; cultural change, human rights and

religious policy and indigenous resources for conflict management.

Saliha Hassan is an associative professor at the Political Science Programme

and an associate fellow at the Institute of Malaysian and International

Relations Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. Her main area

of research is political development in Malaysia with a focus on the

dynamics of democratization as played out in the context of Malaysian civil

society. Her latest publication is Social Movements in Malaysia: From Moral

Communities To NGOs (RoutledgeCurzon 2003), which she co-edited with

Meredith L. Weiss.

Baogang He (BA, Hangzhou University, 1981; MA, People’s University of

China, Beijing, 1986; PhD, ANU, Australia, 1993) is currently senior research

fellow, East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore and reader at

the School of Government, the University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. Dr

He is the author of The Democratization of China (New York and London:

Routledge, 1996, 1998, 2000), The Democratic Implication of Civil Society in

China (London: Macmillan, New York: St. Martin, 1997), Nationalism, National

Identity and Democratization in China (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000, with Yingjie

Guo), and Between Democracy and Authority: An Empirical Study of Village

Election in Zhejiang, (Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press, 2002,

with Lang Youxing). He has also published many book chapters and journal

articles. Dr He was awarded the Mayer prize by the Australia Political

Science Association in 1994 for the best article published in the Australian

Journal of Political Science. He has been awarded Australian Research Council

(ARC) large grants, and five ARC small grants. This current work stems from

an ARC-funded project and a National University of Singapore-funded

project.

Thomas Heberer is professor of Political Science/East Asian Politics at

University of Duisburg, Germany. He has worked as a translator and reader

at the Foreign Language Press in Peking from 1977 to 1981. Since the early

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page ix Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

x The Power of Ideas

1980s, he periodically has conducted field research in China, e.g. on

nationalities policy, on the individual economy, on rural urbanization and

social change, and on private entrepreneurs and their social and political

function. Major book publications since the 1990s include Corruption in

China. Analysis of a political, economic and social problem (in German, Opladen:

Westdeutscher Verlag, 1991); Mao Zedong, the immortal revolutionary,

(Hamburg 1995: Institute of East Asian Affairs); ed. together with K.K. Vogel,

in German, Political Participation of Women in East Asia (Hamburg 1997); in

German, co-author W. Taubmann, Transformation of China’s Rural Society:

Urbanization and socio-economic change in the countryside (Opladen:

Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998); in German, Entrepreneurs as Strategic Groups.

Social and Political Function of Private Entrepreneurs in China and Vietnam,

(Hamburg: Institute of East Asian Affairs, 2001); in German, Falungong:

Religion, Sect or Cult? A ‘Salvation Community’ as a Manifestation of

Modernization Problems and Processes of Social Alienation (Jena: IKS Garamond,

2001; and Private Entrepreneurs in China and Vietnam – Social and Political

Functioning of Strategic Groups (Leiden: Brill, 2003).

Sunhyuk Kim is assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at

the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. He was a research

professor at the Asiatic Research Center at Korea University, Seoul, during

the 2002–2003 academic year and served as the Research Director of the

Pacific Council on International Policy’s recent project on Korea, ‘The

Reshaping of Korea’. His research interests include democratization, civil

society, political economy, state-society relations, and social movements in

Korea. Dr Kim’s recent publications include The Politics of Democratization in

Korea: The Role of Civil Society; The Politics of Economic Reform in Korea; The

Political Origins of South Korea’s Economic Crisis; Democratization and

Environmentalism; The Politics of Dual Transition in South Korea; and Civic

Mobilization for Democratic Reform.

Lee Lai To is Head of the Department of Political Science as well as

Academic Convenor of the Master of Social Sciences (International Studies)

Programme at the National University of Singapore. Dr Lee – who has

written and lectured internationally and regionally on Chinese politics, the

South China Sea conflicts, cross-strait relations and Asia-Pacific security –

has also been taking part in many of the academic and Track Two conferences

on regional and international affairs. His publications include nine books

(three solely authored and six edited or co-edited), numerous articles in

international and regional journals, and a large number of conference papers

and chapters in books.

Patrick Raszelenberg studied Philosophy, Political Science and Philology

in Munich, Madrid and Boston. In 1991–1993, he was research fellow at

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page x Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

Contributors xi

the Institute of Asian Affairs in Hamburg. In 1993–1996, he stayed in

Vietnam. In 1996–1998, he studied East Asian Studies in Cambridge, MA.

In 1999–2002, he was a research fellow at the Institute for East Asian

Studies at Duisburg University.

Nora Sausmikat has degrees in Sinology, Anthropology, and Theatre

Science. She was a research fellow with the University of Duisburg,

Germany, and is currently working for the Federal German Culture

Foundation in Beijing, China. Her PhD thesis was on the perception of the

Chinese Cultural Revolution in women’s narrated life stories. She has

written extensively in German and English on women’s studies, history of

Chinese intellectuals, political reform movements and contemporary

Chinese theatre.

Gunter Schubert is professor for Sinology with the University of Tuebingen,

Germany. Research Fields: Chinese Politics, East Asian Security, Compara￾tive Research on Democratization, Nationalism. Main publications: Chinas

Kampf um die Nation: Dimensionen nationalistischen Denkens in der VR China,

Taiwan und Hongkong an der Jahrtausendwende (China’s Struggle for the

Nation: Dimensions of Nationalist Thought in the People’s Republic of

China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong at the Turn of the 21st Century, Institute for

Asian Studies Special Series No. 357, Hamburg 2002); Taiwan – Die chinesische

Alternative. Demokratisierung in einen ost-asiatischen Schwellenland, 1986–1993

(Taiwan – The Chinese Alternative. Democratization in an East Asian Newly

Industrializing Country, Institute of Asian Studies Special Series No. 237,

Hamburg 1994); Blockierte Demokratien in der Dritten Welt (Defunct Democra￾cies in the Third World, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1998, co-edited with Rain￾er Tetzlaff); Menschenrechte in Ostasien (Human Rights in East Asia,

Tübingen: Mohr–Siebeck 1999).

Carlyle A. Thayer is professor of Politics at the Australian Defence Force

Academy. He is presently on secondment to Deakin University as their

Academic Co-ordinator at the Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies, Aus￾tralian Defence College. Professor Thayer has been working on Vietnamese

politics for over three decades. He has published extensively on Vietnamese

domestic and foreign policy. He is the author of War By Other Means: National

Liberation and Revolution in Vietnam (1989); The Vietnam People’s Army Under

Doi Moi (1994); Beyond Indochina, Adelphi Paper 297 (1995); co-author of

Soviet Relations with India and Vietnam (1992), and co-editor of Vietnam and the

Rule of Law (1993) and Vietnamese Foreign Policy in Transition (1999).

Martina Timmermann is Academic Programme Officer and Director of

Studies on Human Rights and Ethics with theUnited Nations University in

Tokyo, Japan. She was also the head of a research project on “The Human

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page xi Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

Rights Politics of Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines: Mirror of ‘Asian

Identity’?” at the Institute of Asian Affairs, Hamburg In the realm of ASEM

IV (2002), she was one of two German delegates to the expert meeting on

Gender at the Asia–Europe Dialogue in Finland. Among several articles on

regional cooperation in Southeast Asia, human rights and gender politics,

she has published The Power of Collective Thought Patterns: Values, Change and

Political Culture in Japan and the United States, Opladen 2000.

Gabriele Vogt is a research fellow for Political Science with the German

Institute for Japanese Studies. She was a visiting scholar at Cornell University

in 2003–2004 and has a PhD in Japanese Science from the University of

Hamburg in 2002, MA in Japanese Science, Political Science and Sociology

from University of Munich in 1998. Field of expertise: community-based

political action, Okinawa’s role in Japan. Major publications: Die Renaissance

der Friedensbewegung in Okinawa (forthcoming, München: Iudicium). “Alle

Macht dem Volk? Das direktdemokratische Instrument als Chance für das

politische System Japans”, Japanstudien 2001 (13): 319–342

Power_of_Ideas_Frontmatter.fm Page xii Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:43 PM

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer

The “Asian crisis” of the late 1990s is over. What has been left? Economically,

the region has recovered. In foreign policy, attention has turned towards fight￾ing international terrorism. Regional politics has been challenged by pandem￾ics such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or avian flu, which,

interestingly enough, had a greater effect on regional cooperation than the

financial crisis of 1997/98. In the meantime, significant domestic political

changes have taken place in almost all countries of East and Southeast Asia,

the effects of which are now beginning to develop clear contours. The future

course of the Asian crisis notwithstanding, we believe that the discourse on

the political future in East and Southeast Asia that was set in motion during

the late 1990s is an expression of growing democratic self-consciousness and

self-assertiveness among the political and intellectual elite.

“Reform” and “change” were the buzzwords of political debate during

the crisis. Consequently, the movements for political change in Indonesia

and Malaysia became known as the Reformasi movements. In other countries,

the reform debate took place in a less turbulent manner, but nonetheless with

a clear promotion of change-oriented interests. In this volume, seventeen

authors have attempted to discern how the Asian crisis has promoted a new

political discourse in the region and in which direction this discourse is

heading. Propositions made by social actors (intellectuals and non￾government organizations [NGOs]) and the push effects they can have on

state actions are central issues of discussion. The political aspect here is the

political propositions that are intended to change the rules and forms of

politics without calling the existing system of government itself into

question. Less concern is given to the radical “dissident level”.

The editors of this volume are quite aware that in every society the

“production of discourse” is not free and unplanned but controlled, selected,

organized and channelled, and in consequence only certain ideas achieve

prominence and can develop push effects. Such discourses, however, reflect

a particular and quite significant segment of politically interested public

opinion. In addition to such political propositions, discourses also have high

conflict potential because they imply an element of change.

Power_of_Ideas_Chapters.fm Page 1 Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:29 PM

2 The Power of Ideas

Discourses in the arena of politics do not surface by themselves. They are

fed with ideas that are picked up for discussion, exchanged, altered and

repeated, or discarded. Ideas get the discourse off the ground and make up

its core nourishment. They are carried and brought into discussion by idea

providers – mostly intellectuals. Discourses, ideas and intellectuals form

three moving legs of a triangle. How fast they are allowed to move, how far

they can move and whether they have a chance to enter the space of political

decision-making, are questions that have not been attended to intensively

with regard to the region of East and Southeast Asia.

In this volume, the movement of change-oriented ideas and the role of

intellectuals within the arena of political discourse will be analysed in the case

of two authoritarian states (China and Vietnam), a multi-ethnic, formally dem￾ocratic state with strong authoritarian leanings (Malaysia) and two democratic

states with significant parochial structures and patterns of behaviour (South

Korea and Japan). The selection corresponds to the following categories of

strong state formations: communist, neo-patrimonial and developmental. It

also corresponds to the fact that the different political and economic situations

of the countries involved have affected different forms of suffering from the

crisis – a fact that should not be completely neglected when comparing them.

REGIONAL SIMILARITIES AND TRANSNATIONAL

PROCESSES IN THE DISCOURSE ON

DEMOCRATIZATION

The belief is strong that the future of regional political systems lies in the

expansion of democracy. Yet there are several gradations of colour in the

understanding of democracy, with some voices tilting towards an

appropriation of Western institutions, and others espousing a synthesis of

Western and indigenous patterns.1

Primarily, traditional and participation￾inducing institutions like village elections (China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia

and Thailand) or particular political ideas and features of a specific political

culture (like particular forms of criticism of government, the state’s obligation

to serve the general good and specific egalitarian concepts of mankind and

society) are regarded as “indigenous”. Chih-Yu Shih refers to “collective

forms” of democracy in East Asia, as opposed to western, individual forms of

democracy. Such “collective forms” apparently correspond to the East Asian

cognitive identity and aim to protect collective interests.2

CONCEPTS OF CHANGE AND DEMOCRACY

Within the political structures, ideas and traditions of Asia, there are factors

that can be regarded as “democratic” or favourably inclined towards

democratic elements. The use of the “western” term democracy would seem

here to be questionable, because although there are certain ideal concepts of

dialogue between leaders and followers and certain types of participation,

these rights are not institutionalized and enforceable. The democratic

Power_of_Ideas_Chapters.fm Page 2 Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:29 PM

Tải ngay đi em, còn do dự, trời tối mất!