Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Phát triển phương pháp tính toán phi tuyến đa tỉ lệ ngẫu nhiên cho vật liệu tổng hợp sợi ngắn ứng dụng cho nghiên cứu ảnh hưởng của cấu trúc vi mô biến đổi đến quá trình phát triển phá hỏng vật liệu
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Luận Án Tiến Sỹ Kỹ Thuật
Phát triển phương pháp tính toán phi tuyến đa tỉ lệ ngẫu
nhiên cho vật liệu tổng hợp sợi ngắn ứng dụng cho
nghiên cứu ảnh hưởng của cấu trúc vi mô biến đổi đến
quá trình phát triển phá hỏng vật liệu
8/2020
Khoa Sau Đại Học Về Khoa Học Và Kỹ Thuật
Đại Học Keio
Hoàng Tiến Đạt
I
LUẬN ÁN
Đã nộp tới Đại học Keio và thỏa mãn hết các tiêu chí của bằng tiến sỹ
Nay, luận án này được nộp tới Đại học Thái Nguyên
II
Abstract
The mechanical properties of fiber reinforced composite materials are scattered
especially in the development of a new and cost-effective manufacturing process. The main
reason lies in the microstructural variability expressed by physical parameters of constituent
materials and geometrical parameters to express the morphology at microscale. The short fiber
reinforced composite materials can be fabricated easily by injection molding method, but they
have random microstructures. To solve the problem considering variability, there have been
many studies on the stochastic finite element method. The first-order perturbation based
stochastic homogenization (FPSH) method has been developed based on the multiscale theory
and verified for porous materials and multi-phase composite materials considering the
variability in physical parameters. However, its applications were limited to linear elastic
problems. Therefore, this study aims at the development of a stochastic nonlinear multiscale
computational method. In its application to short fiber reinforced composites, the final goal of
this study is to clarify the important random factors in the microstructure that give significant
influence on the damage propagation.
Firstly, the above FPSH method was extended for the stochastic calculation of
microscopic strain. This theory enabled us to analyze the damage initiation and propagation in
a stochastic way. Since huge scenarios exist in the nonlinear behaviors, however, a subsampling scheme was proposed in the analysis by FPSH method together with the sampling
scheme for geometrical random parameters. Furthermore, to reduce the computational time for
practical and large-scale analyses of stochastic damage propagation problems, a numerical
algorithm to accelerate the convergence of element-by-element scaled conjugate gradient
(EBE-SCG) iterative solver for FPSH method was developed. The efficiency was demonstrated
for spherical particulate-embedded composite material considering the damage in the coating
layer and the variability in physical parameter.
Finally, the developed computational method was applied to short fiber reinforced
composite materials. The fiber length distribution, fiber orientation denoted by two angles and
III
fiber arrangement were considered as the geometrical parameters in addition to a physical
random parameter. 11 models were analyzed having different fiber orientation and fiber
arrangement with variability. In the sub-sampling, 2 scenarios with 50% and 0.3% probabilities
were analyzed, which resulted in totally 22 cases. The differences among 22 possible damage
patterns were discussed deeply. It was figured out that very largely scattered degradation of
homogenized macroscopic properties was mostly affected by the fiber arrangement rather than
the fiber orientation. This finding was different from the result in linear elastic region. The
physical random parameters were more influential on the macroscopic properties. Also in these
analyses, the accelerated EBE-SCG method was again shown to be efficient.
IV
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to give my deep gratitude to my advisor Prof. Naoki Takano,
who is one of my great and respected teachers in my life. He always gives me very clear guidance
and suggestions from the first contact before entering to Keio University until now. When I was
stuck in some difficult tasks, he encouraged, taught and provided very good ideas to motivate me.
He is very close and smiling with students in the discussion. Besides asking about my research, he
sometimes asks about my family and my student life and understands the difficulties of international
students in Japan. Without him, I could not complete my research and learn much new knowledge.
I am deeply grateful to him for being my advisor.
I am sincerely grateful to Prof. Fukagata, Prof. Omiya, and Assist. Prof. Muramatsu for
being the reviewers of my dissertation. From their valuable questions and comments, I could
improve the dissertation well and understand more about the limitations as well as the potential
applications of my proposed method in the future works.
I would like to extend my thankfulness to Assoc. Prof. Akio Otani (Kyoto Institute of
Technology) for supporting the measured fiber length data, and Prof. Heoung-Jae Chun (Yonsei
University) for giving me necessary knowledge about composite materials. I also would like to
thank all my labmates for three years at Keio University. Especially, Mr. Kohei Hagiwara came to
take me in Haneda airport and helped me prepared for my student life on the first days in Japan;
And, Mr. Daichi Kurita, Mr. Yutaro Abe, Mr. Lucas Degeneve, and Mr. Ryo Seino joined to discuss
my research topic and assisted me to use some Japanese software in our Lab. Besides, Mr. Yuki
Nakamura, Mr. Tatsuto Nose, and Ms. Mizuki Maruno also helped me to easily get involved in the
student life, and Japanese culture. I also would to thank Dr. Akio Miyoshi and Mr. Shinya Nakamura
from Insight, Inc., company for helping us to develop the Meshman Particle Packing software.
Next, I greatly thank the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
of Japan for supporting the full scholarship (Monbukagakusho – MEXT) to me in 3 years at Keio
University. In addition, I would like to thank Keio University for providing the Keio Leading-Edge
Laboratory of Science and Technology (KLL) funding. I also want to express my gratitude to my
home university, Thai Nguyen University of Technology for giving me an opportunity to study in
Japan, keeping my lecturer position when I come back, and also paying a part of my salary.
Finally, I would like to give millions of love to my parents, my wife, my daughter, and my
son. They always encourage and look forward every single day of my life. Especially, I could not
express my words to describe the sacrifice of my wife to take care of the children when I was not
at home (2 internships in USA, 2 years in Taiwan and 3 years in Japan). To show my gratitude
towards everybody, I tried to hard study every day to complete the tasks as well as possible. This
dissertation is the achievement that I would like to give to everyone.
V
Chapter of Contents
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... II
Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................IV
Chapter of Contents................................................................................................................... V
List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... VIII
List of Tables............................................................................................................................XI
Abbreviation............................................................................................................................XII
Nomenclatures....................................................................................................................... XIII
Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Short fiber reinforced composite materials ................................................................. 6
1.2.1. Injection molding and conventional micromechanical model ............................. 6
1.2.2. Fiber length, fiber orientation and fiber arrangement .......................................... 8
1.3 Aims and scopes of research ..................................................................................... 11
1.4 Structure of dissertation............................................................................................. 12
Chapter 2 Literature review and methodologies ...................................................................... 14
2.1 Micromechanics, multiscale approach and homogenization with composite
materials............................................................................................................................... 14
2.2 Damage model and damage criteria .......................................................................... 20
2.3 Variability, uncertainty or randomness ..................................................................... 26
2.3.1 Variability of physical properties....................................................................... 26
2.3.2 Variability of geometrical parameters................................................................ 27
2.3.3 Variability of loading and boundary conditions................................................. 28
2.3.4 Variability of manufacturing process parameters .............................................. 28
VI
2.4 Stochastic finite element methods............................................................................. 29
2.5 First-order perturbation based stochastic homogenization method for composite
materials............................................................................................................................... 31
2.6 Stochastic modeling of fiber reinforced composites ................................................. 34
Chapter 3 Stochastic calculation of microscopic strain ........................................................... 36
3.1 Microscopic displacement ......................................................................................... 36
3.2 Derivation of microscopic strain in stochastic way................................................... 38
3.3 Numerical example of microscopic strain considering only variability of physical
parameters ............................................................................................................................ 41
Chapter 4 Stochastic nonlinear multiscale computational scheme with accelerated EBE-SCG
iterative solver.......................................................................................................................... 50
4.1 Sampling and sub-sampling for stochastic nonlinear multiscale computational
scheme.................................................................................................................................. 50
4.2 Acceleration of EBE-SCG iterative solver................................................................ 56
4.3 Numerical example.................................................................................................... 60
4.3.1 Verification of the accelerated EBE-SCG solver by characteristic displacement
visualization ..................................................................................................................... 60
4.3.2 Stochastic damage propagation.......................................................................... 65
4.3.3 Degradation of homogenized properties............................................................ 68
4.3.4 Acceleration of solution for nonlinear simulation.............................................. 68
Chapter 5 Application to short fiber reinforced composites to study the influence of
microstructural variability on damage propagation ................................................................. 71
5.1 Microstructural modeling and sampling.................................................................... 71
5.2 Numerical results....................................................................................................... 77
5.2.1 Probable damage patterns................................................................................... 77
VII
5.2.2 Microscopic strain during damage propagation ................................................. 79
5.2.3 Homogenized properties in linear and nonlinear analysis ................................. 80
5.3 Acceleration of EBE-SCG during damage propagation............................................ 81
5.4 Discussion of influence level of variability in physical and geometrical parameters 83
Chapter 6 Concluding remarks................................................................................................. 87
List of publications................................................................................................................... 91
References................................................................................................................................ 92
VIII
List of Figures
Fig. 1. 1 Distribution of mechanical properties of constituent materials................................... 4
Fig. 1. 2 Influence of order on the variance of outcome result .................................................. 4
Fig. 1. 4 Injection molding process............................................................................................ 7
Fig. 1. 5 Model of an injection molded structure ..................................................................... 10
Fig. 1. 6 Main points and their relations in structure of dissertation........................................ 13
Fig. 2. 1 Multiscale framework ................................................................................................ 15
Fig. 2. 2 Unit cell array ............................................................................................................ 17
Fig. 2. 3 Classification of composite materials........................................................................ 19
Fig. 2. 4 Rate of use for different failure criteria for composite materials in published papers
by others................................................................................................................................... 23
Fig. 2. 5 General framework of stochastic finite element approach ........................................ 30
Fig. 2. 6 Two-scale problem of heterogeneous media ............................................................. 33
Fig. 3. 1 Flowchart of damage analysis formulation................................................................ 36
Fig. 3. 2 Definition of SVE for short fiber-reinforced composite material.............................. 42
Fig. 3. 3 Microscopic strain
33
in interphase and short fibers when random physical
parameters for all constituent materials are considered ........................................................... 45
Fig. 3. 4 RVE models of glass fiber reinforced plastics composite based on the lognormal
distribution ............................................................................................................................... 47
Fig. 3. 5 Definition of two cross-sections ................................................................................ 48
Fig. 3. 6 Microscopic effective strain distributions on the cross-section 1-2 under macroscopic
strain
2
31 E 0 02 10
. ............................................................................................................ 49
Fig. 3. 7 Microscopic effective strain distributions on the cross-section 2-3 under macroscopic
strain
2
31 E = 0 02 10
. ............................................................................................................ 49
IX
Fig. 4. 1 General flowchart of research algorithm ................................................................... 53
Fig. 4. 2 Detail algorithm of stochastic damage propagation analysis..................................... 54
Fig. 4. 3 Accelerated procedure for the EBE-SCG solver in Fig. 4.1 ...................................... 57
Fig. 4. 4 Visualization of characteristic displacements of two successive sub-cycles............. 58
Fig. 4. 6 SVE model of coated particle-embedded composite material................................... 60
Fig. 4. 7 Finite element model of coated particle-embedded composite material ................... 61
Fig. 4. 8 Zeroth-order terms of characteristic displacements in x direction
11 0
x
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 62
Fig. 4. 9 Zeroth-order terms of characteristic displacements in y direction
11 0
y
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 63
Fig. 4. 10 Zeroth-order terms of characteristic displacements in z direction
11 0
z
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 63
Fig. 4. 11 First-order terms of characteristic displacements in x direction
11 1
3
x
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 64
Fig. 4. 12 First-order terms of characteristic displacements in y direction
11 1
3
y
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 64
Fig. 4. 13 First-order terms of characteristic displacements in z direction
11 1
3
z
of two
successive sub-cycles at (a) cycle 1 and (b) cycle 17 .............................................................. 65
Fig. 4. 14 Stochastic damage propagation of coated particle-embedded composite material . 66
Fig. 4. 15 Damage element visualization of a half of coating.................................................. 67
Fig. 4. 16 Damage element visualization of a half of coating.................................................. 67
Fig. 4. 17 Degradation of homogenized macroscopic properties DH when ............................ 68
Fig. 4. 18 Acceleration ratios and convergence histories in EBE-SCG iterations to calculate 69
Fig. 4. 19 Acceleration ratios and convergence histories in EBE-SCG iterations to calculate 70
X
Fig. 5. 1 Microstructure modeling for skin-core-skin layered specimen of injection molded
short fiber reinforced composite material ................................................................................ 72
Fig. 5. 2 Example model of Meshman Particle Packing .......................................................... 73
Fig. 5. 3 Microstructure models with different fiber arrangements for given fiber angel
variabilities by modified Meshman ParticlePacking................................................................ 74
Fig. 5. 4 Definition of fiber orientation and SVE model of short fiber reinforced composites75
Fig. 5. 5 Initial configuration of samples for cycle 1,
1 S X ...................................................... 76
Fig. 5. 6 Some damage patterns predicted at cycle 3, E = 0.005,
3 S X
n
(n = 0 or 3)................. 78
Fig. 5. 7 Influence of physical parameters on damage pattern when the properties of matrix 78
Fig. 5. 11 Strain distributions in matrix highlighting on high strain value and on the............. 80
Fig. 5. 12 Degradation of apparent stiffness ............................................................................ 81
Fig. 5. 13 Number of EBE-SCG iterations and damaged volume evolution of a sample
3 1 2 |
S A X X .................................................................................................................................. 82
Fig. 5. 14 Number of EBE-SCG iterations and damaged volume evolution of a sample
3 1 4 |
S A X X .................................................................................................................................. 83
Fig. 5. 15 SVE specification in degraded apparent stiffness with enlarged views on the........ 84
Fig. 5. 16 Influence of fiber arrangement on damaged volume evolution ............................... 85
Fig. 5. 17 Homogenized properties without damage ............................................................... 86
Fig. 5. 18 Variability influence level of physical and geometrical parameters........................ 86