Giảm tiểu cầu trong bệnh sốt rét tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Bình Phước

chung toi giup ngi/di bac sT lam sang danh gia 2 yeu

to: mau rang theo vi tri rang va mau s ic rang chung

cua cong dong nghien cCru. Nhi/ vay, khi thi/c hien

phuc hoi thclm ml cho ca mot nhom rang phia tri/dc,

khong nen lam cac rang cCfa, cac rang nanh va cac

rang ham nho cung mau nhau. Cu the hon, khi li/a

chon mau cho rang cura, khong nen li/a chpn nhCfng

mau qua sang nhi/ A1, B1 vi day la nhCfng mau rang

khong pho bien trong cong dong, khong the dem lai

ve dep ti/ nhien cho benh nhan. Thay vao do, nen li/a

chon mau A2 cho nhom rang cCra va tat nhien la cung

phai can nhac them cac yeu to khac da noi 0 tren.

Sau do, li/a chpn mau cho nhom rang nanh va rang

ham nho theo nhom rang cCra. Ben canh do, do 2

nhom rang nanh va rang ham nho khong co stf khac

biet co y nghTa thong ke ve do sang va do do nen khi

li/a chpn mau phuc hoi P 2 nhom rang nay, cac nha

lam sang nen quan tam den si/ khac biet ve do vang.

Nhom rang nanh se co do vang cao nhat. Cac gia tri

do sang va do do cua 2 nhom rang nanh va rang ham

nho la khong khac biet, li/a chpn do sang thap hon va

do do cao hon nhom rang cifa cho 2 nhom rang nay.

KET LUAN VA KIEN NGHj

Nhom rang cifa: L* (84,6 ± 6,8), a* (-1,25 ± 1,9),

b* (19,8 ± 4,8). Nhom rang nanh: L* (80,2 ± 6,6), a*

(1,23 ± 1,6), b* (29 ± 5,6). Nhom rang ham nho: L*

(80,4 ± 7), a* (0,9 ± 1,8), b* (27,2 ± 3,8).

Co si/ khac biet ve cac chi so mau rang giufa cac

nhom rang. Rang cura co do sang cao nhat, do do va

vang thap nhat. Rang nanh co do sang thap nhat, do

do va do vang cao nhat. Nhom rang ham nho co cac

chi so cl mifc trung binh.

Do pham vi cd mau nho, chi/a dai dien cho cong

dong, can co nhufng nghien cut) vdi cd mau Idn hon

va tren cac vung mien de tim ra thong so mau sac

rSng dai dien cho cong dong Viet.

Do han che ve thdi gian va nhan li/c, nghien ci/u

mdi chi di/a ra cac chi so mau s ic cho vi tri chinh

giufa than rang. De co the xay di/ng di/pc ban do mau

sic toan bo than rang thi can co nghien cifu danh gia

chi tiet ti/ng vi tri tren rang

Cac ket qua cua nghien cull mang y nghTa thi/c tien

va hoan toan co the ap dung cho nha khoa lam sang.

SUMMARY

Objectives: Evaluation color's toothgroups follows the

CIE La'b* color space in group of Diplomatic Academy

students. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study,

GIAM TIEU CAU TRONG BENH SOT RET TAI

TOM TAT

D$t van de: Tin suat giam tieu cau giao dQng

khoang 24-94% d benh sot ret trong cac tai li$u y van

va van chua rd bien chung huyet hQc nay la nhiSu hon

o’ P. vivax (P.v), P. falciparum (P.f) hay nhiim hdn hop

Nghien cuv nay tim hieu d$c diem giam tieu cau cua

evaluate me color or tne incisors, canines ana premoiar

tooth using Vita Easyshade compact in 90 students of the

Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam between the age 1 8-20

Results and conclusions: The results, accroding CIE

La'b': Incisors: L (84.6 ± 6.8), a ' (-1.25 ± 19), b ' (19 8 ±

4.8); canines: L (80.2 ± 6.6), a* (1.23 ± 1.6), b ' (29 ± 5.6);

premolars: L (80.4 ± 7), a* (0.9 ± 1.8), b ' (27 2 ± 3 8)

There is statistically significant difference (p<0 001)

between 3 toothgroups. Recommendations: The results of

studying can be useful for the clinician. In restorative

dentistry, when chose color for incisor, canine, premoiar

tooth, the dentist should consider about the difference of

L, a* and b ' between them.

Keywords: Tooth color, color measurement, color

space, colorimeter, spectrophotometer.

TAI LIEU THAM KHAO

1. Joiner A. (2004), Tooth color: a review of the

literature, Journal of Dentistry, 32, 3-12.

2. Yoshida A., Miller L., Da Silva J.D. et al (2010),

Spectrophotometric Analysis of Tooth Color

Reproduction on Anterior All-Ceramic Crowns: Part 2:

Color Reproduction and Its Transfer from In Vitro to In Vivo,

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 22, 53 - 63.

3. Odioso L.L., Gibb R.D., Gerlach R.W. (2000),

Impact of demographic, behavioural, and dental care

utilization parameters on tooth color and personal

satisfaction, Compendium of Continuing Education in

Dentistry, 21, 35 - 41.

4. Xiao J., Zhou X.D., Zhu W.C. et al (2007), The

prevalence of tooth discolouration and the self￾satisfaction with tooth colour in a Chinese urban

population, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34, 351-360.

5. Hasegawa A., Motonomi A., Ikeda I. et al (2000),

Color of natural tooth crown in Japanese people, Color

Research and Application, 25, 43 - 48.

6. Tuncdermir A.R. Polat S., Ozturk C. et al (2012),

Color differences between maxillar and mandibular

incisors, European Journal of General Dentistry, 1 (3),

170 - 173.

7. Zhu H., Lei Y., Liao N. (2001),Color measurements

of 1944 anterior teeth of people in south west of China,

Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 36, 285-288.

8. Kim - Pusateri S., Brewer J.D, Davis E.L., et al

(2009), Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade￾matching devices, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,

101,193 - 199.

9. Le Van Son, Nguyen Thi Chau, Le Thi Thu Ha va

C.S. (2013), Danh gia dac diem lam sang rang nhiem

sic Tetracycline mi/c do I va II, Tap chi Y hoc thuc hanh,

3(864), 152 - 156.

BENH VIEN DA KHOA TINH BINH PHIT0C

NGUYEN PHUONG NAM. TRAN THI KIM AU

b0nh nhan sot ret diSu tri nQi tru tai Benh Vi$n Da Khoa

Tinh Binh Phuvc. Doi tuyng - phuKmg phap nghien ciru:

Hoi cuv benh an benh nhan nh$p vien tCr 01/2010 den

12/2012 vi sot va xet nghi$m cd hi$n di$n ky sinh tnjng

sot ret tren phet mau ngoai vi. Ket qua: Trong thdi gian

nghien cuv cd 285 BN du tieu chuan 249/285 (87,4%)

Y HOC THUC HANH (922) - SO 6/2014 91