Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

College test english 4 doc
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
LearningExpress Skill Builders • CHAPTER 3 59
lege athletes are underpaid, and there are many who
would disagree. Some would say that the value of
tuition-free education, room and board, and the future
earning capacity that a college education and athletic
training provides more than compensates college athletes. But those same people cannot dispute that college athletes earn one-tenth the salary that professional
athletes earn. All they can argue is that it isn’t fair or
equitable, and that argument immediately throws the
statement into the realm of opinion or belief.
So one way to distinguish fact from opinion is to
apply the debate test. If a statement can be debated it
is opinion, not fact. Read these statements.
1. Carbon dioxide emissions produce unhealthy air.
2. The Environmental Protection Agency must
enforce legislation to protect the air from increased
carbon dioxide emissions.
Sentence one (1) is a claim of fact. It cannot be
disputed that carbon dioxide emissions harm air quality. Scientific data eliminates all debates. But how we
feel about that fact, and how we use that fact, is what
takes it from fact to opinion, or belief. For example, sentence two (2) uses the fact that CO2 is an air pollutant
to suggest the need for government enforcement of air
quality controls. Many Americans would disagree that
such intervention is either needed or even constitutional. Notice, the disagreement is not about the fact,
but about how the fact is used.
Next, decide whether the following statements are
fact or opinion.
1. All Americans have the right to healthcare.
2. Congress has required the implementation of a
new TV ratings system to aid parents in the selection of appropriate viewing for their children.
3. The new TV ratings system represents yet another
unnecessary effort on the part of the government to reduce individual responsibility.
4. Affirmative action programs are morally correct
for America.
5. Legalization of assisted suicide would benefit terminally ill patients by giving them more control
of their own destiny.
You’ll notice that these statements aren’t quite as
easy to work with as the first group of sentences. But
you must remember the debate test and decide if the
statement can be argued. Is it a fact or an opinion that
all Americans have the right to health care? Well, about
the only thing debatable in that statement is who
should pay for the care? And how should it be provided?
Statement one is a fact; where we go with it presents
the debate.
Statement two is also a claim of fact.You may not
agree with what Congress did, and you may even disagree with the whole concept of censoring what children watch on TV, but the statement simply says that
Congress has legislated that there must be a system to
do it.
Statement three is definitely a claim of opinion
or belief. Whether or not the ratings system was necessary and whether or not the system will increase or
decrease individual responsibility is highly debatable.
But the fact remains; there is now a system of ratings.
Statement four is also a claim of opinion or
belief. It isn’t telling us whether or not there are affirmative action programs, which would be a claim of fact,
but it is telling us that these programs are morally correct.
Statement five is a claim of fact. Legalizing assisted
suicide would give the terminally ill more control. This
is a highly charged claim of fact with lots of arguments
–READING COMPREHENSION–