Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Using mind mapping to teach second year cadets vocabulary in intensive reading - A quasi - experimental study at telecommunication university in NhaTrang
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
i
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY
……………………………….
USING MIND MAPPING TO TEACH SECOND YEAR CADETS
VOCABULARY IN INTENSIVE READING: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL
STUDY AT TELECOMMUNICATION UNIVERSITY IN NHATRANG
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Arts (TESOL)
Submitted by Nguyen Thi Hien
Supervisor
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nguyen Thanh Tung
Ho Chi Minh City, August 2018
ii
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
I certify that the thesis entitled “Using mind mapping to teach second year cadets
vocabulary in intensive reading: A quasi-experimental study at Telecommunication
University in Nha Trang” is my original work; it is based on my own research to meet
the requirements of a Master’s Program at Ho Chi Minh City Open University issued
by the Higher Degree Committee.
All sources used by me have been documented. No other person’s work has been
used without due acknowledgement.
This piece of work has not previously been submitted for assessment in this or
any other subject or course at this University or elsewhere.
Ho Chi Minh City, August 2018
Nguyen Thi Hien
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nguyen Thanh
Tung, a vice dean at the Department of English in the Ho Chi Minh City University of
Education, who was always giving me the best constructive comments and advice
about my writing. This paper is my own work, but he guided me to do this paper in the
right direction.
I would also like to thank the experts for their participation in the survey in this
research project: Ms. Ngo Thi Thuy Duong and Ms. Bui Thi Minh Nguyet, lecturers
and MA holders at Telecommunication University in Nha Trang. Without their
passionate participation and input, the survey could not have been successfully
conducted. They were also the second readers of this thesis and I am very grateful for
their valuable comments.
I would also like to acknowledge my colleagues at Telecommunication
University in Nha Trang and TESOL 10 classmates at Ho Chi Minh City Open
University who were always willing to help me so much to finish this paper work to
the soonest.
Finally, I must express my very profound gratitude to my parents for providing
me with unfailing support and continuous encouragement throughout my years of study
and through the process of researching and writing up this thesis. This accomplishment
would not have been possible without them.
iv
ABSTRACT
Although a number of studies were carried out to improve the quality of teaching
and learning vocabulary at universities recently, students still have difficulties in
lexical learning. Therefore, this study is aimed to examine the effect of using mind
mapping on the vocabulary achievement in intensive reading of the second year cadets
at Telecommunication University (TCU) in Nha Trang.
Based on theoretical framework of mind mapping (MM), the quasi-experimental
research was carried out during the second school year in 2017. Fifty-six cadets of the
two classes at TCU were divided into two groups: Control group (CG) and
experimental group (EG). The EG was exposed to the MM. Meanwhile, the CG had
traditional English vocabulary lessons. Data were collected from three sources: a pretest and a post-test to measure the cadets’ vocabulary improvements after the study
treatment, a pre-questionaire and a post-questionnaire to assess the changes in their
attitudes towards vocabulary learning with MM and an interview with 10 random
cadets in the EG to clarify their attitudes.
The findings of the study show the effectiveness of the technique on TCU second
year cadets. In fact, it not only helps them to remember words longer but also do the
tests better. Furthermore, according to the interview and questionnaires, they feel more
relaxed, active, creative, and learner-centered. Thanks to this, their motivation in
learning vocabulary increased.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP......................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................iv
LIST OF FIGURES..............................................................................................ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................ix
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1
1.1 Background of the study... ..............................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the problem ................................................................................3
1.3 Research aims and questions...........................................................................4
1.4 Significance of the study.................................................................................4
1.5 Structure of the study ......................................................................................5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................6
2.1 Concept of MM ...............................................................................................6
2.1.1 Definition of MM.......................................................................................6
2.1.2 Characteristics of MM ...............................................................................8
2.1.3 Classification of MM .................................................................................9
2.2 Ways to make MM.........................................................................................13
2.2.1 Center image............................................................................................14
2.2.2 Key word.................................................................................................14
2.2.3 Basic ordering ideas.................................................................................15
2.2.4 Branches..................................................................................................16
2.2.5 Colors......................... .............................................................................17
2.2.6 Pictures...................... ..............................................................................18
2.3 Advantages of MM........................................................................................19
2.3.1 Vocabulary ability....................................................................................20
2.3.2 Attitude to vocabulary learning ...............................................................21
2.4 Where and when to use MM in intensive reading .......................................22
vi
2.4.1 The use of MM techniques in pre-reading...............................................24
2.4.2 The use of MM techniques in while-reading ...........................................25
2.4.3 The use of MM techniques in post-reading .............................................26
2.5 Empirical research ...........................................................................................26
2.6 Chapter summary............................................................................................28
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...............................................29
3.1 Research site..................................................................................................29
3.2 Research participants.....................................................................................29
3.3 Methodology .................................................................................................30
3.3.1 Approach .................................................................................................31
3.3.2 Method .....................................................................................................32
3.3.3 Techniques...............................................................................................32
3.3.3.1 Test....................................................................................................32
3.3.3.2 Questionnaire ....................................................................................34
3.3.3.3 Interview............................................................................................35
3.3.3.4 Summary ...........................................................................................36
3.4 Analytical framework....................................................................................36
3.4.1 Quantitative analysis of vocabulary test results in the pre- and post-test 37
3.4.2 Quantitative analysis of the pre- and post-questionnaire.........................38
3.4.3 Qualitative analysis of interview .............................................................38
3.5 Validity and reliability ..................................................................................39
3.6 Chapter summary ..........................................................................................40
CHAPTER 4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION ....................................................41
4.1 Data analysis .................................................................................................41
4.1.1 Data analysis of vocabulary test results in the pre-test and post-test ......41
4.1.1.1 Data analysis of vocabulary test in pre-test ......................................41
4.1.1.2 Data analysis of vocabulary test in post-test.....................................42
4.1.2 Comparison of mean scores.....................................................................43
4.1.2.1 Resemblance of vocabulary test results in the pre-test of EG and CG43
vii
4.1.2.2 Difference of vocabulary test results in the post-test of EG and CG 44
4.1.3 Questionnaire data analysis.....................................................................46
4.1.3.1 Pre-questionnaire data analysis.........................................................46
4.1.3.2 Post-questionnaire data analysis .......................................................55
4.1.4 Interview data analysis ............................................................................63
4.2 Discussion of findings...................................................................................67
4.2.1 Cadets’ improvement in vocabulary learning .........................................67
4.2.2 Cadets’ positive change in attitudes towards learning vocabulary..........69
4.3 Chapter summary ..........................................................................................69
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................71
5.1 Conclusions...................................................................................................71
5.2 Evaluation of research methodology.............................................................72
5.2.1 Strengths...................................................................................................72
5.2.2 Weaknesses..............................................................................................72
5.3 Recommendations.........................................................................................72
5.3.1 For teachers..............................................................................................72
5.3.2 For students..............................................................................................74
5.4 Suggestion for further research .....................................................................74
5.5 Chapter summary ..........................................................................................74
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................76
APPENDICES....................................................................................................81
APPENDIX 1: PRE-TEST ...............................................................................81
APPENDIX 2: POST-TEST.............................................................................87
APPENDIX 3: PRE-QUESTIONNAIRE .......................................................93
APPENDIX 4: POST-QUESTIONNAIRE.....................................................97
APPENDIX 5: INTERVIEW.........................................................................101
APPENDIX 6: MODEL LESSON PLAN FOR CG.....................................102
APPENDIX 7: MODEL LESSON PLAN FOR EG.....................................108
viii
APPENDIX 8 ..................................................................................................114
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Example of MM (Buzan, 2007).....................................................................8
Figure 2.2: Network-tree (Ersoy & Panwar, 1992)........................................................10
Figure 2.3: An event chain (Glencoe Science, n.d.) ......................................................10
Figure 2.4: Cycle-concept maps (Glencoe Science, n.d.)..............................................11
Figure 2.5: A spider concept map (Glencoe Science, n.d.)............................................11
Figure 2.6: Word relationships (Antonacci, 1991) ........................................................12
Figure 2.7: A word map (Walpole & McKenna, 2007).................................................13
Figure 2.8: Example of center image (Buzan, 2006).....................................................14
Figure 2.9: Example of keyword (Windura, 2008)........................................................15
Figure 2.10: Example of basic ordering ideas (Erkan, 2018) ........................................16
Figure 2.11: Example of branches (Illumine Training, 2015) .......................................17
Figure 2.12: Example of colours (Illumine Training, 2017)..........................................18
Figure 2.13: Example of picture (Buzan, 2006, p. 2).....................................................19
Figure 4.1: Pre-test score distribution of control and experimental class......................42
Figure 4.2: Post-test score distribution of control and experimental group...................42
Figure 4.3: Cadets’ opinions about role of vocabulary in learning English ..................47
Figure 4.4: Cadets’ opinions about how difficult learning vocabulary is......................48
Figure 4.5: The frequency of cadets in learning telecommunication vocabulary..........49
Figure 4.6: The main difficulties in learning telecommunication vocabulary of CG and
EG...................................................................................................................................50
Figure 4.7: How cadets overcome unknown telecommunication vocabulary in both
classes.............................................................................................................................51
Figure 4.8: Cadets’ strategies to remember telecommunication vocabulary.................53
Figure 4.9: Cadets’ awareness about mind map strategies ............................................55
Figure 4.10: EG cadets’ opinions about learning vocabulary........................................56
Figure 4.11: The main difficulties in learning telecommunication vocabulary of EG
after the study.................................................................................................................57
Figure 4.12: How cadets overcome unknown telecommunication vocabulary in EG
after the study.................................................................................................................58
Figure 4.13: Cadets’ strategies to remember telecommunication vocabulary in EG after
the study .........................................................................................................................59
Figure 4.14: EG cadets’ opinions on MM strategy........................................................61
Figure 4.15: EG cadets’ opinions on application of MM strategy to learn
telecommunication vocabulary after the study ..............................................................62
x
Figure 4.16: EG cadets’ opinions on the helpfulness of MM strategy ..........................62
xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CG: Control group
EG: Experimental group
EFL: English as a foreign language
MM: Mind-mapping
MMs: Mind maps
S.D.: Standard deviation
STD: Standard
SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences
TCU: Telecommunication University
xii
LISTS OF TABLE
Table 3.1: Participants’ characteristics ..........................................................................30
Table 3.2: Teaching schedule.........................................................................................33
Table 3.3: Summary of instruments of data collection ..................................................36
Table 3.4: Reliability statistics for the pre-questionnaire ..............................................39
Table 3.5: Reliability statistics for the post-questionnaire.............................................40
Table 4.1: Class statistics of pre-test results ..................................................................43
Table 4.2: Independent samples t-test of the pre-test.....................................................44
Table 4.3: Class statistics of post-test results.................................................................45
Table 4.4: Comparison of the results of the 2 classes in the post-test ...........................45
Table 4.5: Cadets’ comments.........................................................................................64