Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Universe a grand tour of modern science Phần 4 ppsx
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Jacques Laskar of the Bureau des Longitudes in Paris was a pioneer in the study
of planetary chaos. He found many fascinating effects, including the possibility
that Mercury may one day collide with Venus, and he drew special attention to
chaotic influences on the orientations of the planets. The giant planets are
scarcely affected, but the tilt of Mars for example, which at present is similar to
the Earth’s, can vary between 0 and 60 degrees. With a large tilt, summers on
Mars would be much warmer than now, but the winters desperately cold. Some
high-latitude gullies on that planet have been interpreted as the products of
slurries of melt-water similar to those seen on Greenland in summer.
‘All of the inner planets must have known a powerfully chaotic episode in the
course of their history,’ Laskar said. ‘In the absence of the Moon, the orientation
of the Earth would have been very unstable, which without doubt would have
strongly frustrated the evolution of life.’
E Also of relevance to the Earth’s origin are Comets and asteroids and Minerals in
space. For more on life-threatening events, see Chaos, Impacts, Extinctions and
Flood basalts. Geophysical processes figure in Plate motions, Earthquakes and
Continents and supercontinents. For surface processes and climate change, see the
cross-references in Earth system.
S hips that leave tokyo bay crammed with exports pass between two
peninsulas: Izu to starboard and Boso to port. The cliffs of their headlands are
terraced, like giant staircases. The flat part of each terrace is a former beach,
carved by the sea when the land was lower. The vertical rise from terrace to
terrace tells of an upward jerk of the land during a great earthquake. Sailors
wishing for a happy return ought to cross their fingers and hope that the
landmarks will be no taller when they get back.
On Boso, the first step up from sea level is about four metres, and corresponds
with the uplifts in earthquakes afflicting the Tokyo region in 1703 and 1923. The
interval between those two was too brief for a beach to form. The second step,
219
earthquakes
five metres higher, dates from about 800 bc. Greater rises in the next two steps
happened around 2100 bc and 4200 bc. The present elevations understate the
rises, because of subsidence between quakes.
Only 20 kilometres offshore from Boso, three moving plates of the Earth’s outer
shell meet at a triple junction. The Eurasian Plate with Japan standing on it has
the ocean floor of both the Pacific Plate and the Philippine Plate diving to
destruction under its rim, east and west of Boso, respectively. The latter two have
a quarrel of their own, with the Pacific Plate ducking under the Philippine Plate.
All of which makes Japan an active zone. Friction of the descending plates
creates Mount Fuji and other volcanoes. Small earthquakes are so commonplace
that the Japanese may not even pause in their conversations during a jolt that
sends tourists rushing for the street. And there, in a nutshell, is why the next big
earthquake is unpredictable.
I Too many false alarms
As a young geophysicist, Hiroo Kanamori was one of the first in Japan to embrace
the theory of plate tectonics as an explanation for geological action. He was coauthor of the earliest popular book on the subject, Debate about the Earth (1970).
For him, the terraces of Izu and Boso were ample proof of an unstoppable process
at work, such that the earthquake that devastated Tokyo and Yokohama in 1923,
and killed 100,000 people, is certain to be repeated some day.
First at Tokyo University and then at Caltech, Kanamori devoted his career to
fundamental research on earthquakes, especially the big ones. His special skill
lay in extracting the fullest possible information about what happened in an
earthquake, from the recordings of ground movements by seismometers lying
in different directions from the scene. Kanamori developed the picture of a
subducted tectonic plate pushing into the Earth with enormous force, becoming
temporarily locked in its descent at its interface with the overriding plate, and
then suddenly breaking the lock.
Looking back at the records of a big earthquake in Chile in 1960, for example,
he figured out that a slab of rock 800 by 200 kilometres suddenly slipped by 21
metres, past the immediately adjacent rock. He could deduce this even though
the fault line was hidden deep under the surface. That, by the way, was the
largest earthquake that has been recorded since seismometers were invented.
Its magnitude was 9.5.
When you hear the strength of an earthquake quoted as a figure on the Richter
scale, it is really Kanamori’s moment magnitude, which he introduced in 1977.
He was careful to match it as closely as possible to the scale pioneered in the
1930s by Charles Richter of Caltech and others, so the old name sticks. The
Kanamori scale is more directly related to the release of energy.
220
earthquakes
Despite great scientific progress, the human toll of earthquakes continued,
aggravated by population growth and urbanization. In Tangshan in China in
1976, a quarter of a million died. Earthquake prediction to save lives therefore
became a major goal for the experts. The most concerted efforts were in
Japan, and also in California, where the coastal strip slides north-westward
on the Pacific Plate, along the San Andreas Fault and a swarm of related
faults.
Prediction was intended to mean not just a general declaration that a region is
earthquake prone, but a practical early warning valid for the coming minutes or
hours. For quite a while, it looked as if diligence and patience might give the
answers.
Scatter seismometers across the land and the seabed to record even the smallest
tremors. Watch for foreshocks that may precede big earthquakes. Check
especially the portions of fault lines that seem to be ominously locked, without
any small, stress-relieving earthquakes. The scientists pore over the seismic
charts like investors trying to second-guess the stock markets.
Other possible signs of an impending earthquake include electrical changes in
the rocks, and motions and tilts of the ground detectable by laser beams or
navigational satellites. Alterations in water levels in wells, and leaks of radon and
other gases, speak of deep cracks developing. And as a last resort, you can
observe animals, which supposedly have a sixth sense about earthquakes.
Despite all their hard work, the forecasters failed to give any warning of the
Kobe earthquake in Japan in 1995, which caused more than 5000 deaths. That
event seemed to many experts to draw a line under 30 years of effort in
prediction. Kanamori regretfully pointed out that the task might be impossible.
Micro-earthquakes, where the rock slippage or creep in a fault is measured in
millimetres, rank at magnitude 2. They are imperceptible either by people or by
distant seismometers. And yet, Kanamori reasoned, many of them may have the
potential to grow into a very big one, ranked at magnitude 7–9, with slippages
of metres or tens of metres over long distances.
The outcome depends on the length of the eventual crack in the rocks. Crack
prediction is a notoriously difficult problem in materials science, with the
uncertainties of chaos theory coming into play. In most micro-earthquakes the
rupture is halted in a short distance, so the scope for false alarms is unlimited.
‘As there are 100,000 times more earthquakes of magnitude 2 than of magnitude
7, a short-term prediction is bound to be very uncertain,’ Kanamori concluded
in 1997. ‘It might be useful where false alarms can be tolerated. However, in
modern highly industrialized urban areas with complex lifelines, communication
systems and financial networks, such uncertain predictions might damage local
and global economies.’
221
earthquakes
I Earthquake control?
During the Cold War a geophysicist at UC Los Angeles, Gordon MacDonald,
speculated about the use of earthquakes as a weapon. It would operate by the
explosion of bombs in small faults, intended to trigger movement in a major
fault. ‘For example,’ he explained, ‘the San Andreas fault zone, passing near Los
Angeles and San Francisco, is part of the great earthquake belt surrounding the
Pacific. Good knowledge of the strain within this belt might permit the setting
off of the San Andreas zone by timed explosions in the China Sea and the
Philippines Sea.’
In 1969, soon after MacDonald wrote those words, Canada and Japan lodged
protests against a US series of nuclear weapons tests at Amchitka in the Aleutian
Islands, on the grounds that they might trigger a major natural earthquake.
They didn’t, and the question of whether a natural earthquake or an explosion,
volcanic or man-made, can provoke another earthquake far away is still debated.
If there is any such effect it is probably not quick, in the sense envisaged here.
MacDonald’s idea nevertheless drew on his knowledge of actual man-made
earthquakes that happened by accident. An underground H-bomb test in Nevada
in 1968 caused many small earthquakes over a period of three weeks, along an
ancient fault nearby. And there was a longer history of earthquakes associated
with the creation of lakes behind high dams, in various parts of the world.
Most thought provoking was a series of small earthquakes in Denver, from 1963
to 1968, which were traced to an operation at the nearby Rocky Mountain
Arsenal. Water contaminated with nerve gas was disposed of by pumping it
down a borehole 3 kilometres deep. The first earthquake occurred six weeks
after the pumping began, and activity more or less ceased two years after the
operation ended.
Evidently human beings could switch earthquakes on or off by using water
under pressure to reactivate and lubricate faults within reach of a borehole. This
was confirmed by experiments in 1970–71 at an oilfield at Rangely, Colorado.
They were conducted by scientists from the US National Center for Earthquake
Research, where laboratory tests on dry and wet rocks under pressure showed
that jerks along fractures become more frequent but much weaker in the
presence of water.
From this research emerged a formal proposal to save San Francisco from its
next big earthquake by stage-managing a lot of small ones. These would gently
relieve the strain that had built up since 1906, when the last big one happened.
About 500 boreholes 4000 metres deep, distributed along California’s fault lines,
would be needed. Everything was to be done in a controlled fashion, by
pumping water out of two wells to lock the fault on either side of a third well
where the quake-provoking water would be pumped in.
222
earthquakes
The idea was politically impossible. Since every earthquake in California would
be blamed on the manipulators, whether they were really responsible or not,
litigation against the government would continue for centuries. And it was all
too credible that a small man-made earthquake might trigger exactly the major
event that the scheme was intended to prevent. By the end of the century
Kanamori’s conclusion, that the growth of a small earthquake into a big one
might be inherently unpredictable, carried the additional message: you’d better
not pull the tiger’s tail.
I Outpacing the earthquake waves
Research efforts switched from prediction and prevention to mitigating the
effects when an earthquake occurs. Japan leads the world in this respect, and a
large part of the task is preparation, as if for a war. It begins with town
planning, the design of earthquake-resistant buildings and bridges,
reinforcements of hillsides against landslips, and improvements of sea
defences against tsunamis—the great ‘tidal waves’ that often accompany
earthquakes.
City by city, district by district, experts calculate the risks of damage and
casualties from shaking, fire, landslides and tsunamis. The entire Japanese
population learns from infancy what to do in the event of an earthquake, and
there are nationwide drills every 1 September, the anniversary of the 1923
Tokyo–Yokohama earthquake. Operations rooms like military bunkers stand
ready to take charge of search and rescue, firefighting, traffic control and other
emergency services, equipped with all the resources of information technology.
Rooftops are painted with numbers, so that helicopter pilots will know where
they are when streets are filled with rubble.
The challenge to earthquake scientists is now to feed real-time information
about a big earthquake to societies ready and able to use it. A terrible irony in
Kobe in 1995 was that the seismic networks and communications systems were
themselves the first victims of the earthquake. The national government in
Tokyo was unaware of the scale of the disaster until many hours after the event.
The provision for Japan’s bullet trains is the epitome of what is needed. As soon
as a strong quake begins to be felt in a region where they are running, the trains
slow down or stop. They respond automatically to radio signals generated by a
computer that processes data from seismometers near the epicentre. When
tracks twist and bridges tumble, the life–death margin is reckoned in seconds.
So the system’s designers use the speed of light and radio waves to outpace the
earthquake waves.
Similar systems in use or under development, in Japan and California, alert the
general public and close down power stations, supercomputers and the like.
223
earthquakes
Especially valuable is the real-time warning of aftershocks, which endanger
rescue and repair teams. A complication is that, in a very large earthquake, the
idea of an epicentre is scarcely valid, because the great crack can run for a
hundred or a thousand kilometres.
I Squeezing out the water
There is much to learn about what happens underground at the sites of
earthquakes. Simple theories about the sliding of one rock mass past another,
and the radiation of shock waves, have now to take more complex processes
into account. Especially enigmatic are very deep earthquakes, like one of
magnitude 8 in Bolivia in 1994. It was located 600 kilometres below the surface
and Kanamori figured out that nearly all of the energy released in the event was
in the form of heat rather than seismic waves. It caused frictional melting of the
rocks along the fault and absorbed energy.
In a way, it is surprising that deep earthquakes should occur at all, seeing that
rocks are usually plastic rather than brittle under high temperatures and
pressures. But the earthquakes are associated with pieces of tectonic plates that
are descending at plate boundaries. Their diving is a crucial part of the process
by which old oceanic basins are destroyed, while new ones grow, to operate the
entire geological cycle of plate tectonics.
A possible explanation for deep earthquakes is that the descending rocks are
made more rigid by changes in composition as temperatures and pressures
increase. Olivine, a major constituent of the Earth, converts into serpentine by
hydration if exposed to water near the surface. When carried back into the
Earth on a descending tectonic plate, the serpentine could revert to olivine by
having the water squeezed out of its crystals. Then it would suddenly become
brittle. Although this behaviour of serpentine might explain earthquakes to a
depth of 200 kilometres, dehydration of other minerals would be needed to
account for others, deeper still.
A giant press at Universita¨t Bayreuth enabled scientists from University College
London to demonstrate the dehydration of serpentine under enormous pressure.
In the process, they generated miniature earthquakes inside the apparatus. David
Dobson commented, ‘Understanding these deep earthquakes could be the key to
unlocking the remaining secrets of plate tectonics.’
I The changes at a glance
After an earthquake, experts traditionally tour the region to measure ground
movements revealed by miniature scarps or crooked roads. Nowadays they can
use satellites to do the job comprehensively, simply by comparing radar pictures
obtained before and after an earthquake. The information contained within an
224
earthquakes
image generated by synthetic-aperture radar is so precise that changes in relative
positions by only a centimetre are detectable.
The technique was put to the test in 1999, when the Izmit earthquake occurred
on Turkey’s equivalent of California’s San Andreas Fault. Along the North
Anatolian Fault, the Anatolian Plate inches westwards relative to the Eurasian
Plate, represented by the southern shoreline of the Black Sea. The quake killed
18,000 people. Europe’s ERS-2 satellite had obtained a radar image of the Izmit
region just a few days before the event, and within a few weeks it grabbed
another.
When scientists at the Delft University of Technology compared the images by
an interference technique, they concluded that the northern shore of Izmit Gulf
had moved at least 1.95 metres away from the satellite, compared with the
southern shore of the Black Sea. Among many other details perceptible was an
ominous absence of change along the fault line west of Izmit.
‘At that location there is no relative motion between the plates,’ said Ramon
Hanssen, who led the analysis. ‘A large part of the strain is still apparent, which
could indicate an increased risk for a future earthquake in the next section of the
fault, which is close to the city of Istanbul.’
E For the driving force of plate motions and the use of earthquake waves as a means of
probing the Earth’s interior, see Plate motions and Hotspots.
225
earthquakes