Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Universal health coverage and the poor: to what extent are health financing policies making a
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Rudasingwa et al. BMC Public Health (2022) 22:1546
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13923-1
RESEARCH
Universal health coverage and the poor:
to what extent are health fnancing policies
making a diference? Evidence from a beneft
incidence analysis in Zambia
Martin Rudasingwa1
, Manuela De Allegri1
, Chrispin Mphuka2
, Collins Chansa1
, Edmund Yeboah1
,
Emmanuel Bonnet3
, Valéry Ridde4 and Bona Mukosha Chitah2*
Abstract
Background: Zambia has invested in several healthcare fnancing reforms aimed at achieving universal access to
health services. Several evaluations have investigated the efects of these reforms on the utilization of health services.
However, only one study has assessed the distributional incidence of health spending across diferent socioeconomic
groups, but without diferentiating between public and overall health spending and between curative and maternal
health services. Our study aims to fll this gap by undertaking a quasi-longitudinal beneft incidence analysis of public
and overall health spending between 2006 and 2014.
Methods: We conducted a Beneft Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and
overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across diferent health facility typologies at
three time points. We combined data from household surveys and National Health Accounts.
Results: Results showed that public (concentration index of −0.003; SE 0.027 in 2006 and−0.207; SE 0.011 in 2014)
and overall (0.050; SE 0.033 in 2006 and−0.169; SE 0.011 in 2014) health spending on curative services tended to
beneft the poorer segments of the population while public (0.241; SE 0.018 in 2007 and 0.120; SE 0.007 in 2014) and
overall health spending (0.051; SE 0.022 in 2007 and 0.116; SE 0.007 in 2014) on institutional delivery tended to beneft
the least-poor. Higher inequalities were observed at higher care levels for both curative and institutional delivery
services.
Conclusion: Our fndings suggest that the implementation of UHC policies in Zambia led to a reduction in socioeconomic inequality in health spending, particularly at health centres and for curative care. Further action is needed to
address existing barriers for the poor to beneft from health spending on curative services and at higher levels of care.
Keywords: UHC, Health fnancing, Beneft incidence analysis, Health benefts, Zambia
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco
mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Introduction
Following the global call to reduce persistent inequalities in health and access to health services, various health
reforms designed towards the attainment of Universal
Health Coverage (UHC) have been implemented in several countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa [1–4].
One of the UHC principles involves ensuring that access
Open Access
*Correspondence: [email protected]
2
Department of Economics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article