Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

There is No Free - An Indigenous Informed Perspective on Free, Prior and Informed Consent
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Wilfrid Laurier University
Scholars Commons @ Laurier
Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive)
2020
There is No F e is No Free: An Indigenous Informed P ee: An Indigenous Informed Perspectiv erspective on Free,
Prior and Informed Consent
Nicole Burns
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd
Part of the Community Psychology Commons
Recommended Citation
Burns, Nicole, "There is No Free: An Indigenous Informed Perspective on Free, Prior and Informed
Consent" (2020). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 2259.
https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/2259
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @
Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Running head: There is No Free I
There is No Free:
An Indigenous Informed Perspective on Free, Prior and Informed Consent
by
Nicole Burns
BA (Hons), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2016
THESIS
Submitted to the Department of Psychology
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for
Master of Arts in Psychology
Wilfrid Laurier University
© Nicole Burns 2020
There is No Free II
Abstract
Many Indigenous nations in Canada are faced with complex issues surrounding proposed
development on their lands. There are numerous rights frameworks that support Indigenous
Peoples’ inherent rights, which includes their right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) in
relation to any development that would impact their lands. This case study examined the various
perspectives of Matawa First Nations in regard to their experiences of consultation with
government and industry. This study was conducted by performing document review and
analysis of three focus groups (n=20), a video analysis of the APTN documentary series Ring of
Fire and survey distribution and analysis (n=49). Results indicate that Matawa’s experience of
the implementation of FPIC fails to comply with Indigenous laws and ideologies and is also not
in keeping with the principles of FPIC itself. Government and industry exercise their power by
creating biased laws, processes, and spaces for consultation and denying Matawa First Nations
any means of participating except by those rules. Matawa First Nations have expressed their
willingness to establish genuine relationships with government and industry and work towards
sustainable development of their lands. This study ends with a list of recommendations for
government and industry to consider in moving forward with consent-seeking in a way that is in
keeping with Indigenous perspectives and the principles of FPIC.
Keywords: FPIC, Indigenous Rights, Rights of Consultation, Matawa First Nations, Ring of Fire
There is No Free III
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Terry Mitchell, for her guidance and support
over the last three years. Thank you for the opportunities you have provided for me with handson learning, dialogue, and community engagement. I truly appreciate all of the support and
insight I have gained from you over the last few years.
I must also acknowledge the mentorship I have received from Darren Thomas and
Courtney Arseneau over the last few years. My learning experience would not be the same
without you two. Thank you both for your genuine insights, your kindness, and your critical
engagement with the theories and ethics behind doing this work in a good way. I appreciate your
knowledge and friendship.
I am very lucky to have two amazing members on my thesis committee, Dr. Manuel
Riemer and Dr. Erich Fox Tree. Thank you both for your thorough reviews of my thesis as it has
gone through its various stages of completion. I truly appreciate the way that you both
challenged me in the development of this manuscript, and I value the different insights you both
brought to the table.
I am also indebted to my partner, Ashlee Burns, who has continued to support me over
the last few years while I pursued my degree. I know it has not been easy for you while I have
had to spend numerous hours between work and school, but I am so thankful that you have
cheered me on in every endeavour.
Lastly, thank you to all my family and friends that have provided emotional support to
me over the last few years while I juggled multiple responsibilities. I am so thankful for you all.
There is No Free IV
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................III
TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................IV
LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................................VII
LIST OF FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................VIII
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1
LITERATURE REVIEW ...............................................................................................................................6
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ................................................................................................................................ 6
THE IMPORTANCE OF LAND ....................................................................................................................................... 8
LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ................................................................................................................................................ 9
Indigenous Laws................................................................................................................................................. 10
International Rights Frameworks....................................................................................................................... 11
Canadian Laws................................................................................................................................................... 15
Canadian Mining Industry ................................................................................................................................. 18
IMPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 19
METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................... 20
PARADIGM ............................................................................................................................................................... 20
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION ....................................................................................................................................... 21
POSITIONALITY ........................................................................................................................................................ 22
LENS FOR ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................ 27
DATA COLLECTION .................................................................................................................................................. 29
ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................................................. 32
Transcripts.......................................................................................................................................................... 32
There is No Free V
Surveys................................................................................................................................................................ 34
KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................................................... 35
FINDINGS.................................................................................................................................................... 35
HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS...................................................................................................................... 37
LEGACIES OF COLONIALISM ........................................................................................................................ 37
RELIANCE ON GOVERNMENT ....................................................................................................................... 39
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 41
GOVERNMENT AGENDA................................................................................................................................. 41
LEGALITY.......................................................................................................................................................... 46
IDEOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................. 51
CLASH OF IDEOLOGIES ................................................................................................................................. 52
COMMUNITY LED PARTICIPATION .............................................................................................................. 56
MOVING FORWARD......................................................................................................................................... 59
SURVEY RESULTS..................................................................................................................................................... 63
SUMMARY OF DATA................................................................................................................................................. 65
DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................... 66
UNLEVEL PLAYING FIELD ........................................................................................................................................ 66
DIMENSIONS TO POWER........................................................................................................................................... 67
Overt Dimension................................................................................................................................................. 68
Covert Dimension............................................................................................................................................... 68
Latent Dimension................................................................................................................................................ 69
QUESTIONING THE LEGALITY................................................................................................................................... 72
THE LARGER PICTURE.............................................................................................................................................. 74
MOVING TOWARDS SELF-DETERMINATION............................................................................................................. 78
MATAWA INFORMED PERSPECTIVE ON FPIC........................................................................................................... 79
There is No Free VI
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................................. 81
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS AND CONTRIBUTIONS ................................................................................................ 82
LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................................................................ 84
RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................................................ 84
APPENDIX.....................................................................................................................................................3
REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................................5
There is No Free VII
List of Tables
Table 1 Methods Linked with Research Objective....................................................................... 32
Table 2 Overview of Categories and Themes............................................................................... 35
Table 3 Survey Responses............................................................................................................ 63
There is No Free VIII
List of Figures
Figure 1 Map of Matawa First Nations and Ring of Fire ............................................................... 3
Figure 2 Matawa Homelands and Traditional Territory Map......................................................... 4
Figure 3 FPIC as an Obligation in Canada ................................................................................... 16
Figure 4 Gaventa’s Power Cube Source: John Gaventa’s (2006) power cube ............................. 28
Figure 5 Ladder of Self-Determined Participation within an Ecological Model.......................... 76
Running head: There is No Free 1
Introduction
In May 2017, I began to work with the Indigenous Rights and Resource Governance
research group (IRRG) under the supervision of Dr. Terry Mitchell where my first task was to
transcribe audio recordings of a conference on free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) that the
IRRG group organized in 2016. Listening to these recordings, and transcribing them verbatim,
put me on the trajectory to do this research. What stood out to me at the time, and what I have
continued to replay over in my head, is the comment “there is no free” that multiple Indigenous
leaders made throughout the audio files when speaking about FPIC. The idea that “there is no
free” offers crucial insight into the critique of FPIC. The voices of these Indigenous leaders have
stuck with me, and I have been on a journey to understand the complex issues with the
implementation of FPIC ever since.
The literature review will explain the legal background for FPIC, while also outlining
complications about its support, which is ultimately tied to Indigenous Peoples’ inherent right to
self-determination. However, it is worth iterating that while there are Western legal frameworks
that uphold these rights, Indigenous Peoples' inherent rights are not granted to them through
Western legal systems but have existed since time immemorial. The right to free, prior, and
informed consent covers a wide range of concepts, but it is also intimately tied to the right to say
yes or no to development or extraction projects on Indigenous territories. Indigenous and
Western legal frameworks are clear on the fact that Indigenous Peoples have authority over their
territories and any entities wishing to engage in extraction or development in those lands must
obtain free, prior and informed consent.
Initially when I began this research, I supposed that if the Canadian government has laws
that make it necessary to obtain free, prior and informed consent when engaging with Indigenous