Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Theory of Gas Injection Processes Franklin M. Orr, Jr. Stanford University Stanford ppt
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Theory of Gas Injection Processes
Franklin M. Orr, Jr.
Stanford University
Stanford, California
2005
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Orr, Franklin M., Jr.
Theory of Gas Injection Processes / Franklin M. Orr, Jr.
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
ISBN xxxxxxxxxxx
1. Enhanced recovery of oil. I. Title. XXXXX XXXXX
c 2005 Franklin M. Orr, Jr.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by an means, without
permission in writing from the author.
To Susan
.
i
Preface
This book is intended for graduate students, researchers, and reservoir engineers who want to
understand the mathematical description of the chromatographic mechanisms that are the basis
for gas injection processes for enhanced oil recovery. Readers familiar with the calculus of partial
derivatives and properties of matrices (including eigenvalues and eigenvectors) should have no
trouble following the mathematical development of the material presented. The emphasis here
is on the understanding of physical mechanisms, and hence the primary audience for this book
will be engineers. Nevertheless, the mathematical approach used, the method of characteristics, is
an essential part of the understanding of those physical mechanisms, and therefore some effort is
expended to illuminate the mathematical structure of the flow problems considered. In addition, I
hope some of the material will be of interest to mathematicians who will find that many interesting
questions of mathematical rigor remain to be investigated for multicomponent, multiphase flow in
porous media.
Readers already familiar with the subject of this book will recognize the work of many students
and colleagues with whom I have been privileged to work in the last twenty-five years. I am
much indebted to Fred Helfferich (now at the Pennsylvania State University) and George Hirasaki
(now at Rice University), working then (in the middle 1970’s) at Shell Development Company’s
Bellaire Research Center. They originated much of the theory developed here and introduced me
to the ideas of multicomponent, multiphase chromatography when I was a brand new research
engineer at that laboratory. Gary Pope and Larry Lake were also part of that Shell group of future
academics who have made extensive use of the theoretical approach used here in their work with
students at the University of Texas. I have benefited greatly from many conversations with them
over the years about the material discussed here. Thormod Johansen patiently explained to me
his mathematician’s point of view concerning the Riemann problems considered in detail in this
book. All of them have contributed substantially to the development of a rigorous description of
multiphase, multicomponent flow and to my education about it in particular.
Thanks are also due to many Stanford students, who listened to and helped me refine the explanations given here in a course taught for graduate students since 1985. Their questions over the
years have led to many improvements in the presentation of the important ideas. Much of the material in this book that describes flow of gas/oil mixtures follows from the work of an exceptionally
talented group of graduate students: Wes Monroe, Kiran Pande, Jeff Wingard, Russ Johns, Birol
Dindoruk, Yun Wang, Kristian Jessen, Jichun Zhu, and Pavel Ermakov. Wes Monroe obtained the
first four-component solutions for dispersion-free flow in one dimension. Kiran Pande solved for
the interactions of phase behavior, two-phase flow, and viscous crossflow. Jeff Wingard considered
problems with temperature variation and three-phase flow. Russ Johns and Birol Dindoruk greatly
extended our understanding of flow of four or more components with and without volume change
on mixing. Yun Wang extended the theory to systems with an arbitrary number of components,
and Kristian Jessen, who visited for six months with our research group during the course of his
PhD work at the Danish Technical University, contributed substantially to the development of
efficient algorithms for automatic solution of problems with an arbitrary number of components
in the oil or injection gas. Kristian Jessen and Pavel Ermakov independently worked out the first
solutions for arbitrary numbers of components with volume change on mixing. Jichun Zhu and
Pavel Ermakov contributed substantially to the derivation of compact versions of key proofs. Birol
Dindoruk, Russ Johns, Yun Wang, and Kristian Jessen kindly allowed me to use example solutions
ii
and figures from their dissertations. This book would have little to say were it not for the work of
all those students. Marco Thiele and Rob Batycky developed the streamline simulation approach
for gas injection processes. Their work allows the application of the one-dimensional descriptions of
the interactions of flow and phase to model the behavior of multicomponent gas injection processes
in three-dimensional, high resolution simulations. All those students deserve my special thanks for
teaching me much more than I taught them.
Kristian Jessen deserves special recognition for his contributions to teaching this material with
me and to the completion of Chapters 7 and 8. He contributed heavily to the material in those
chapters, and he constructed many of the examples.
I am indebted to Chick Wattenbarger for providing a copy of his “gps” graphics software. All
of the figures in the book were produced with that software.
I am also indebted to Martin Blunt at the Centre for Petroleum Studies at Imperial College of
Science, Technology and Medicine for providing a quiet place to write during the fall of 2000 and
for reading an early draft of the manuscript. I thank my colleagues Margot Gerritsen and Khalid
Aziz, Stanford University, for their careful readings of the draft manuscript. They and the other
faculty of the Petroleum Engineering Department at Stanford have provided a wonderful place to
try to understand how gas injection processes work. The students and faculty associated with
the SUPRI-C gas injection research group, particularly Martin Blunt, Margot Gerritsen, Kristian
Jessen, Hamdi Tchelepi, and Ruben Juanes, and our dedicated staff, Yolanda Williams and Thuy
Nguyen, have done all the useful work in that quest, of course. It is my pleasure to report on a
part of that research effort here.
And finally, I thank Mark Walsh for asking questions about the early work that caused us to
think about these problems in a whole new way. I also thank an anonymous proposal reviewer who
said that the problem of finding analytical solutions to multicomponent, two-phase flow problems
could not be solved and even if it could, the solutions would be of no use. That challenge was too
good to pass up.
The financial support for the graduate students who contributed so much to the material presented here was provided by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy, and by the member
companies of the Stanford University Petroleum Research Institute Gas Injection Industrial Affiliates program. That support is gratefully acknowledged.
Lynn Orr
Stanford, California
March, 2005
Contents
Preface i
1 Introduction 1
2 Conservation Equations 5
2.1 General Conservation Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 One-Dimensional Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 Pure Convection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.4 No Volume Change on Mixing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5 Classification of Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.6 Initial and Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.7 Convection-Dispersion Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.8 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.9 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 Calculation of Phase Equilibrium 21
3.1 Thermodynamic Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.1 Calculation of Thermodynamic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.1.2 Chemical Potential and Fugacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.2 Calculation of Partial Fugacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3 Phase Equilibrium from an Equation of State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.4 Flash Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.5 Phase Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.5.1 Binary Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.5.2 Ternary Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.5.3 Quaternary Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.5.4 Constant K-Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.6 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3.7 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4 Two-Component Gas/Oil Displacement 43
4.1 Solution by the Method of Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.2 Shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.3 Variations in Initial or Injection Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
4.4 Volume Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
iii
iv CONTENTS
4.4.1 Flow Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.4.2 Characteristic Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.4.3 Shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.4.4 Example Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4.5 Component Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.7 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.8 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
5 Ternary Gas/Oil Displacements 73
5.1 Composition Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
5.1.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
5.1.2 Tie-Line Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.3 Nontie-Line Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.4 Switching Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.2 Shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
5.2.1 Phase-Change Shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
5.2.2 Shocks and Rarefactions between Tie Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
5.2.3 Tie-Line Intersections and Two-Phase Shocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
5.2.4 Entropy Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
5.3 Example Solutions: Vaporizing Gas Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
5.4 Example Solutions: Condensing Gas Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
5.5 Structure of Ternary Gas/Oil Displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
5.5.1 Effects of Variations in Initial Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
5.6 Multicontact Miscibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
5.6.1 Vaporizing Gas Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
5.6.2 Condensing Gas Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
5.6.3 Multicontact Miscibility in Ternary Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
5.7 Volume Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
5.8 Component Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
5.9 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
5.10 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
5.11 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
6 Four-Component Displacements 135
6.1 Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, and Composition Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
6.1.1 The Eigenvalue Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
6.1.2 Composition Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
6.2 Solution Construction for Constant K-values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
6.3 Systems with Variable K-values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
6.4 Condensing/Vaporizing Gas Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
6.5 Development of Miscibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
6.5.1 Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
6.5.2 Effect of Variations in Initial Oil Composition on MMP . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
6.5.3 Effect of Variations in Injection Gas Composition on MMP . . . . . . . . . . 169
CONTENTS v
6.6 Volume Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
6.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
6.8 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
6.9 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
7 Multicomponent Gas/Oil Displacements 179
by F. M. Orr, Jr. and K. Jessen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
7.1 Key Tie Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
7.1.1 Injection of a Pure Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
7.1.2 Multicomponent Injection Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
7.2 Solution Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
7.2.1 Fully Self-Sharpening Displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
7.2.2 Solution Routes with Nontie-line Rarefactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
7.3 Solution Construction: Volume Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
7.4 Displacements in Gas Condensate Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
7.5 Calculation of MMP and MME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
7.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
7.7 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
8 Compositional Simulation 213
by F. M. Orr, Jr. and K. Jessen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
8.1 Numerical Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
8.2 Comparison of Numerical and Analytical Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
8.3 Sensitivity to Numerical Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
8.4 Calculation of MMP and MME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
8.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
8.6 Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Nomenclature 241
Bibliography 244
Appendix A: Entropy Conditions in Ternary Systems 255
Appendix B: Details of Gas Displacement Solutions 266
Index 280
vi CONTENTS
Chapter 1
Introduction
When a gas mixture is injected into a porous medium containing an oil (another mixture of hydrocarbons), a fascinating set of interactions begins. Components in the gas dissolve in the oil,
and components in the oil transfer to the vapor as local chemical equilibrium is established. The
liquid and vapor phases move under the imposed pressure gradient at flow velocities that depend
(nonlinearly) on the saturations (volume fractions) of the phases and their properties (density and
viscosity). As those phases encounter the oil present in the reservoir or more injected gas, new
mixtures form and come to equilibrium. The result is a set of component separations that occur
during flow, with light components propagating more rapidly than heavy ones. These separations
are similar to those that occur during the chemical analysis technique known as chromatography,
and they are the basis for a variety of enhanced oil recovery processes. This book describes the
mathematical representation of those chromatographic separations and the resulting compositional
changes that occur in such processes.
Gas injection processes are among the most widely used of enhanced oil recovery processes
[62, 117]. CO2 floods are being conducted on a commercial scale in the Permian Basin oil fields
of west Texas (see references [90, 81, 118, 116] for examples of the many active projects), and a
very large project is underway in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska [74]. At Prudhoe Bay, dry gas is
injected into the upper portion of the reservoir to vaporize light hydrocarbon liquids and remaining
oil, and in other portions of the field a gas mixture that is enriched in intermediate components
is being injected to displace the oil. Large-scale gas injection is also underway in a variety of
Canadian projects [110, 72] and in the North Sea [124]. In all these processes, there are transfers
of components between flowing phases that strongly affect displacement performance. The goal
of this book is to develop a detailed description of the interactions of equilibrium phase behavior
and two-phase flow, because it is those interactions that make possible the efficient displacement
of oil by gas known as “miscible flooding [112].” We will examine in some detail the mathematical
description of the physical mechanisms that produce high local displacement efficiency. While the
approach involves considerable mathematical effort, the effort expended on that analysis will pay
off in the development of rigorous ways to calculate the injection gas compositions and displacement
pressures required for miscible displacement and a very efficient semianalytical calculation method
for solving one-dimensional compositional displacement problems.
While the focus here is on gas/oil displacements in porous media, the ideas, and the mathematical approaches apply to physical processes that range from flow of traffic on a highway to
chemical reactions in a tubular reactor to compressible fluid flow. Chapter 1 of First Order Partial
1
2 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Differential Equations: Vol. I by Rhee, Amundson and Aris [106] describes these and other physical
systems for which the equations solved have many similarities to those considered here.
For flow in porous media, the approach applies to many physical systems in which the convection
of one or more phases dominates the flow, and the effects of dispersive mixing can be neglected.
The basis for the theory is the description of chromatography, in which components in a mixture
separate as they flow through a column because the components adsorb (and subsequently desorb)
with different affinities onto a stationary phase [108, 30]. In chromatography, however, only the
carrier fluid moves, and hence there is no nonlinearity that results when two or more phases flow.
Similar theory applies to ion exchange [102], diagenetic alteration of porous rocks [34, 63] and to
leaching of minerals [9]. Many of these ideas also apply to the area of geologic storage of carbon
dioxide [85], or CO2 sequestration, as it is sometimes called. These processes are intended to reduce
the rate of increase of the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere by injecting CO2 that would
otherwise be released to the atmosphere into subsurface formations such as deep saline aquifers or
coalbeds [139].
In the area of enhanced oil recovery, theoretical descriptions of the displacement of oil by water
containing polymer and displacement of oil by surfactant solutions are closely linked to the theory
described here. In fact, the theory for three-component systems was developed first for applications
to surfactant flooding [31, 35, 65], processes that make use of chemical constituents in the injection
fluid that lower interfacial tension between oil and water. Effects of volume change as components
transfer between phases were not considered in that work, a completely reasonable assumption for
the liquid/liquid phase equilibria of surfactant/oil/water mixtures. In gas/oil systems, however,
some components can change volume quite substantially as they move between liquid and vapor
phases. Dumore et al. [22] worked out the extension of the three-component theory to include the
effects of volume change. Monroe et al. [82] reported the first solutions for four-component gas/oil
displacements.
Many other investigators contributed to the development of the full theory for three and four
component systems. A detailed review by Johansen [50] summarizes the relevant papers published
through 1990. Lake’s [62] comprehensive description of enhanced oil recovery also cites the large
body of work related to polymer and surfactant flooding processes.
This book applies the one-dimensional theory of multicomponent, multiphase flow to gas/oil
displacements. In Chapter 2, the appropriate material balance equations are derived, and the
assumptions that lead to the limiting cases explored in detail are stated. An introduction to the
representation of phase equilibria with an equation of state is given in Chapter 3. Chapter 4
considers two-phase flow of two components that are mutually soluble. When effects of volume
change are ignored, a modest generalization of the familiar Buckley-Leverett solution [10] results.
That simple two-phase flow reappears in more complex flows involving more components, and hence
its description is the basis for understanding multicomponent systems. The most important effects
of volume change as components transfer between phases are also illustrated in Chapter 4.
The theory of three-component gas/oil displacements is developed in Chapter 5. The threecomponent theory leads directly and rigorously to the ideas of “multicontact miscible” displacement
via condensing or vaporizing gas drives. Extensions of the analysis to systems with more than three
components are considered in Chapters 6 and 7. That treatment shows that there are important
features of gas injection processes that cannot be represented by three-component descriptions of
the phase behavior. Chapter 6 describes the construction of solutions for four-component displacements and explores the resulting implications for multicontact miscible displacements known as
3
condensing/vaporizing gas drives, which turn out to be relevant to many gas injection projects now
underway in field applications. Chapter 7 extends the theory to systems with an arbitrary number
of components in the oil or the injection gas. Chapter 7 also describes how the one-dimensional
theory can be applied to create a rigorous method for calculating the so-called minimum miscibility
pressure, the displacement pressure required to achieve high displacement efficiency, for multicomponent systems. Thus, all the mathematical effort does pay off with a calculation method of
considerable practical value.
Effects of dispersive mixing are ignored in the development of the theory presented in Chapters
4-7, though, of course, some dispersion will be present in all real displacements. Furthermore,
finite difference compositional simulations of gas/oil displacements normally include some effects
of numerical dispersion. In fact, many finite difference compositional simulations are strongly and
adversely affected by numerical dispersion. Chapter 8 shows that numerical solutions for the onedimensional flow equations converge to the analytical solutions, with sufficiently fine grids, and it
describes how displacement behavior changes when dispersion also acts. Chapter 8 also explains
when and why numerical schemes that have been proposed for calculating the minimum miscibility
pressure fail to give accurate estimates.
Flow is never one-dimensional in actual field-scale gas injection projects, and hence, many
additional factors influence the performance of those multidimensional flows: viscous instability,
gravity segregation, reservoir heterogeneity, and crossflow due to viscous and capillary forces [62].
Even so, the one-dimensional theory can be used effectively to describe the behavior of threedimensional flows by coupling one-dimensional solutions with streamline representations of the
flow in heterogeneous reservoirs [119, 121, 8, 120, 16, 43]. The resulting compositional streamline
approach can be orders of magnitude faster than conventional finite difference reservoir simulation,
and it is more accurate because it is affected much less by numerical dispersion [109].
Water is also always present and is often flowing in addition to oil and gas. In addition, threephase flow of CO2/hydrocarbon mixtures is also observed at temperatures about 50 C and pressures
near the critical pressure of CO2 [25, 94, 86, 61]. The approach used here to study the mechanisms
of gas/oil displacements has also been applied to the flow of three immiscible phases [137, 24, 27].
LaForce and Johns obtained solutions for three-phase flow for ternary systems with composition
variation in the two-phase regions that bound the three-phase region on a ternary phase diagram.
In any real displacement, of course, all these physical mechanisms interact with the chromatographic separations that occur in both one-dimensional and multidimensional flows. Hence the
analysis given here of one-dimensional flow is only a first step toward full understanding of fieldscale displacements. It is an important first step, however, because it reveals how and why high
displacement efficiency can be achieved in gas injection processes, and thus it provides the understanding needed to design an essential part of any gas injection process for enhanced oil recovery.
4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 2
Conservation Equations
The fundamental principle that underlies any description of flow in a porous medium is conservation
of mass. The amount of a component present at any location is changed by the motion of fluid with
varying composition through the porous medium. Thus, the first issue to be faced in constructing
a model of a flow process is to define and describe the flow mechanisms that contribute to the
transport of each component. For gas/oil systems, the physical mechanisms that are most important
are:
1. Convection – the flow of a phase carries components present in the phase along with the flow,
2. Diffusion – the random motions of molecules act to reduce any sharp concentration gradients
that may exist, and
3. Dispersion – small-scale random variations in flow velocity also cause sharp fronts to be
smeared (when transversely averaged concentrations are calculated or measured). Dispersion
during flow in a porous medium is always modeled as if it were qualitatively like diffusion.
For a detailed discussion of the relationship between diffusion and dispersion, see [100] or [5].
In this chapter, we derive the differential equations solved in subsequent chapters, and we state
the assumptions required to reduce the general material balance equations to the special cases
considered in detail below. Effects of chemical reactions are not included in the flow problems
considered here, nor are effects of adsorption or temperature variation. Derivations that include
such effects are given by Lake [62].
2.1 General Conservation Equations
Consider an arbitrary volume, V (t), of the porous medium bounded by a surface, S(t). A material
balance on component i in the control volume can be stated as
Rate of change of
amount of component i in V (t)
=
Net rate of inflow of component
i into V (t) due to
flow of phases
+
Net rate of inflow of component
i into V (t) due
to hydrodynamic
dispersion
5