Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

The Self-Made Tapestry Phần 8 pdf
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
The researchers set out to construct a simple theoretical model of this process. To do so, they had to
establish criteria for when avalanches started and stopped. These criteria are well explored for piles of
grains, and you can see them for yourself by tipping up bowls of granulated sugar and long-grain rice
until they undergo avalanches. First, smooth the surfaces of the materials so that they are both
horizontal. Then slowly tilt the bowls until a layer of grains shears off and runs out in an avalanche.
There is a critical angle, called the angle of maximum stability (θm), at which sliding takes place.
Moreover, when the avalanche is over, the slope of the grains in the bowl will have decreased to a value
for which it is stable. This is called the angle of repose (θr), and the slope always relaxes to this same
angle (Fig. 8.10). Both of these avalanche angles depend on the grain shapeyou'll find that θm for rice is
larger than that for sugar, whereas granulated sugar, caster sugar and couscous (all with roughly
spherical grains) all have a similar angle within the accuracy of this kitchen-table demonstration.
You can see the same thing by letting a steady trickle of sugar pass through a hole in a bag so that it
forms a heap on the table top. The heap grows steeper and steeper until eventually there is a miniature
landslide. Thereafter, you'll find that, however much more sugar you add, the slope of the pile stays
more or less constant as it grows, with little landslides making sure that this is so. The angle of the
steady slope is the angle of repose.
Fig. 8.11
The stratification that takes place when mixed grains
are poured can be mimicked in a simple theoretical model in
which the two grains have different shapes: square and
rectangular. The model assumes that as the are poured, the grains stack up into colums,
with all of the rectangular
grains upright (a). Although this is a highly artificial
assumption, it reporduces the effect of different grain
shapes, which is the cause of the stratification. The angle of
maximum stability θm is such that the difference in height
between one column and the next cannot exceed three
times the width of the square grains; and the angle of
repose θr is equivalent to a height difference of two (b).
If a new grain added to the top of the slope creates a slope
greater than m, it tumbles from column to column until it
finds a stable position (c). But if the grain has to go all the way
to the foot of the pile (as in c), this implies that the slope
is equal to θm everywhere. The pile then undergoes a landslide
to reduce the slope everywhere to θr or less (d).
(After: Makse et al. 1997.)
It was quite by chance that Hernán Makse had decided to conduct his initial experiments with sand
Page 208
and sugar, which have slightly different shapes and therefore slightly different angles of maximum
stability and reposedifferent sizes alone wouldn't have given the stratification. So in the model that he
and his colleagues developed, they tried crudely to mimic this difference in shape. They considered two
types of grain: small square ones and larger rectangular ones. These were assumed to drop onto the pile
so as to stack in columns (Fig. 8.11). This model seems highly artificialthe experimental grains are
clearly not squares and rectangles, nor do they stack up in regular vertical columns. But it's only a rough
first shot, aimed at capturing the essentials of the process.
The heap was assigned characteristic angles of repose and maximum stability. When a grain drops onto
the pile to create a local slope greater than θm, it tumbles down from column to column until it finds a
position for which the slope is less than or equal to θm. But if a grain tumbles all the way to the bottom,
which means that the slope everywhere is already equal to θm then a landslide is considered to occur in
the model: all the grains tumble, starting at the bottom, until the slope everywhere is reduced to the
angle of repose θr.
Fig. 8.12
The model outlined above generates the same kind
of stratification and segregation as seen experimentally.
(Image: Hernán Makse, Schlumberger-Doll Research,
Ridgefield, Connecticut.)
Because the large grains are 'taller' and so more readily introduce a local slope greater than θm, they
tumble more readilyjust as in the experiments (remember that the large grains are less easily trapped on
the slope). This accounts for the segregation of grains, with the larger ones at the bottom. The
researchers found that all experiments showed this segregation when the grains were of different sizes.
Stratificationstriped layersrequires something more, however. They found that this happened
experimentally when the two types of grain not only have different sizes but also different angles of
repose; that of the smaller grains being less steep than that of the larger grains. Because the particles in
the model were not just of different sizes but also of different shapes, the model captures this feature of
the experiments too. So when played out on the computer, it is able to produce piles that are both
segregated and stratified (Fig. 8.12). The simple model, therefore, does a fair jobbut it may neglect
some important factors such as dynamical effects of grain collisions. These may explain, for example,
why the pouring rate is also critical to obtaining good stratification.
Roll out the barrel
Fig. 8.13
Avalances of grains in a rotating drum will mix different
grains that are initially divided into two segments (a).
As the drum turns, there is a succession of avalanches each
time the slope exceeds the angle of maximum stability,
transposing the dark wedges to the white wedges (b, c, d).
If the drum is less than half-full (b), the wedges overlap, and
the two types of grain eventually become fully mixed. If the durn is exactly half-full (c),
the wedges do not overlap, so mixing
takes place only within individual wedges. When it is more than
half-full (d), there is a central core in which avalanches never
take place, so this circular region never gets mixed.
As bricklayers know well, an easy but generally effective way to mix two substances is to place them
inside a rotating drum, like a cement mixer. But when the substances are powders, don't expect the
obvious. This became clear to Julio Ottino and co-workers at
Page 209
Northeastern University in Illinois when they tried to mix two types of salt, identical except for being
dyed different colours, in this way (Fig. 8.13a). If the drum rotates slowly enough, the layer of granular
material remains stationary until the drum tips it past its angle of repose, whereupon the top layer slides
in an avalanche (Fig. 8.13b). This abruptly transports a wedge of grains from the top to the bottom of
the slope. The drum meanwhile continues to rotate until another wedge slides.
Fig. 8.14 14
The unmixed core is clearly visible in
experiments. (Photo: Julio Ottino,
Northwestern University, IIIinois.)
Each time a wedge slides, the grains within it get scrambled (because they are identical apart from
colour). So if the grains are initially divided into two compartments separated by a vertical boundary
(Fig. 8.13a), they become gradually intermixed by avalanches. But are grains also transported between
wedges? They are if the drum is less than half-full, because then successive wedges intersect one
another (Fig. 8.13b). But when it is exactly half-full the wedges no longer overlap (Fig. 8.13c), and
mixing occurs only within individual wedges. If the drum is more than half-full, something strange
occurs. There is a region around the outer part of the drum where avalanches and mixing take place, but
in the central region is a core of material that never slides (Fig. 8.13d). The initially segregated grains in
this core therefore stay segregated even after the drum has rotated many times. This, Ottino and
colleagues observed, leaves a central pristine region of rotating, unmixed grains, while the region
outside becomes gradually mixed (Fig. 8.14). In theory, you could spin this cement mixer for ever
without disturbing the core.