Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

The implementation of cooperative learning activities in the fifth grade English speaking classes - Primary school teachers' perceptions and practices
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
i
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
I certify that this thesis entitled “The Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Activities in the Fifth Grade EFL Speaking Classrooms: Primary School Teachers’
Perceptions and Classroom Practices” is my own work.
Except where reference is made in the text of the thesis, this thesis contains material
published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have
qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma.
No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text
of the thesis.
This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other
tertiary institution.
Ho Chi Minh City, August 2018
TRAN LUU THI HUYEN, MRS.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Master of Arts in TESOL thesis is the result of a fruitful collaboration of all the
people who have kindly contributed with an enormous commitment and enthusiasm in
my research. Without the help of those who supported me at all times and in all possible
ways, it would not have been feasible for me to complete my M.A. thesis.
First of all, I am deeply indebted to my supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pham Vu Phi Ho,
from Van Hien University of Ho Chi Minh City, whose compassion, encouragement and
guidance throughout the research have helped in the completion of this thesis. I have
truly learned from the excellence of his skills and from his wide experience in research;
no words are adequate to describe the extent of my gratitude.
I am also sincerely grateful to all lecturers of the Open University in Ho Chi Minh City
for providing me with invaluable sources of intellectual knowledge during my study
there. This knowledge was very useful when I conducted this research.
Besides, a big thank you goes to my friend TESOL M.A. Truong Minh Hoa for his
valued friendship and for his assistance, comments, proofreading, and encouragement
throughout the study.
I owe a great debt of gratitude to the anonymous participants who contributed data to this
thesis. Without them the data collection for this study could not properly been carried out.
iii
iv
ABSTRACT
One of many factors that cause difficulty in developing primary students’ speaking skill
is their low or uneven participation. Indeed, children need both to participate in
communication and to build up knowledge and skills for participation in order to learn
speaking skills. Accordingly, Cooperative Learning activities have been proved to be an
effective teaching strategy to the primary students. By the nature of an exploratory study,
this current study aimed at investigating the primary English teachers’ perceptions and
classroom practices of implementing these activities to develop the fifth graders’ English
oral productions.
To achieve this purpose, a body of literature on Cooperative Learning activities including
definitions, types, principles, benefits and challenges were reviewed in the theory chapter
to shape the theoretical framework of the study.
Based on this conceptual framework, the study was conducted at the eight public primary
schools in District 1, Ho Chi Minh City with the sample of 35 teachers. Data were
collected through the two instruments of a 34-item questionnaire and a semi-structured
interview. Quantitative results from the questionnaire were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 while
qualitative results from the interview were thematically analyzed.
The findings of the study indicated that although the participants believed in the effects of
Cooperative Learning activities in the development of their students’ EFL speaking skills
apropos of two aspects including learning psychology and oral performance, they were
reluctant to implement these activities, which was ultimately found by the extent, the
principles and the types of Cooperative Learning activities which they employed in
reality.
Based on the research findings, the paper concluded with some pedagogical implications
and a recommendation for further study in the line of research on Cooperative Learning
activities.
v
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii
ABSTRACT iii
TABLE OF CONTENT iv
LIST OF TABLES viii
LIST OF CHARTS, FIGURES ix
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Background of the Study 1
1.2. Statement of the Problem 3
1.3. Aims of the Study 5
1.4. Research Questions 5
1.5. Significance of the Study 5
1.6. An Overview of the Study 6
Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1. Teaching Speaking 8
2.1.1. Definitions of Speaking Skill 8
2.1.2. Importance of Speaking Skill 9
2.1.3. Principles of Teaching Speaking 9
2.2. Background of Cooperative Learning 12
2.2.1. Definitions 12
2.2.2. Typical Activities 12
2.2.2.1. Discussion 13
2.2.2.2. Role-Play 14
2.2.2.3. Storytelling 14
2.2.2.4. Jigsaw Activities 14
2.2.2.5. Three Steps Interview 15
2.2.2.6. Think Pair Share 15
2.2.3. Teachers’ and Learners’ Roles in Cooperative Learning 16
2.2.3.1. Teachers’ Roles 16
2.2.3.2. Students’ Roles 16
vi
2.2.4. Benefits and Challenges of Cooperative Learning Implementation 17
2.2.4.1. Benefits 17
2.2.4.2. Challenges 19
2.2.5. Principles for the Implementation of Cooperative Learning 20
2.2.5.1. Positive Interdependence 20
2.2.5.2. Individual Accountability 21
2.2.5.3. Group Formation 21
2.2.5.4. Simultaneous Interaction 22
2.2.5.5. Appropriate Use of Social Skills 22
2.3. Background of Young Learners 22
2.3.1. Definitions 22
2.3.2. Characteristics 23
2.4. Previous Studies 25
2.5. Research Gaps 29
2.6. Conceptual Framework 29
2.7. Chapter Summary 32
Chapter 3: METHODOLOGY 33
3.1. Overall Research Approach 33
3.1.1. Research Design 33
3.1.2. Research Procedure 34
3.1.3. Sampling Technique 36
3.2. Research Settings and Participants 37
3.2.1. Research Settings 37
3.2.2. Research Participants 39
3.3. Research Instruments 40
3.3.1. Questionnaire 41
3.3.1.1. Rationale for Questionnaire 41
3.3.1.2. Description of the Questionnaire (see Appendix A) 41
3.3.1.3. Administrating the Questionnaire 44
3.3.2. Interview 46
3.3.2.1. Rationale for Interview 46
3.3.2.2. Description of the Interview (see Appendix B) 46
3.3.2.3. Conducting Interviews 47
3.4. Data Analysis Framework 48
vii
3.4.1. Quantitative Analysis for the Questionnaire 48
3.4.2. Qualitative Analysis for the Interview 49
3.5. Methodological Issues 49
3.5.1. Validity 50
3.5.2. Reliability 50
3.5.3. Ethical Considerations 51
3.5.3.1. Consent Form 51
3.5.3.2. Anonymity and Confidentiality 51
3.6. Chapter Summary 52
Chapter 4: DATA ANALYSIS 53
4.1. Questionnaire Reliability Analysis 53
4.2. Theme Analysis 54
4.2.1. Teachers’ Perceptions about Teaching Speaking Skills at Primary Level 54
4.2.2. Teachers’ Perceptions about Effects of Cooperative Learning Activities on Primary
Students’ Affective States
58
4.2.3. Teachers’ Perceptions about Effects of Cooperative Learning Activities on Primary
Students’ Oral Performance
62
4.2.4. Teachers’ Perceptions about Challenges of Implementing Cooperative Learning
Activities at Primary Schools
66
4.2.5. Frequency Rate of Actually Implementing Cooperative Learning Activities 70
4.2.6. The Types of the Actually Implemented Cooperative Learning Activities 72
4.2.7. The Principles for Implementing Cooperative Learning Activities in Actuality 76
4.3. Chapter Summary 81
Chapter 5: DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS 82
5.1. Teachers’ Perceptions on the Implementation of Cooperative Learning Activities in
Fifth Grade EFL Speaking Classes
82
5.2. Teachers’ Classroom Practices on the Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Activities in Fifth Grade EFL Speaking Classes
90
5.3. Chapter Summary 95
Chapter 6: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 96
6.1. Summary of Key Findings 96
6.1.1. Research Question 1 96
6.1.2. Research Question 2 97
6.2. Evaluation of Methodology 98
viii
6.2.1. Strengths 99
6.2.2. Limitations 99
6.3. Recommendations for the Teachers 99
6.4. Recommendations for Further Research 101
6.5. Chapter Summary 101
RFERENCES 102
APPENDIX A.1: TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRE (ENGLISH VERSION) 108
APPENDIX A.2: TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRE (VIETNAMESE VERSION) 112
APPENDIX B.1: TEACHER INTERVIEW PROMPTS (ENGLISH VERSION) 116
APPENDIX B.2: TEACHER INTERVIEW PROMPTS (VIETNAMESE VERSION) 117
APPENDIX C: TEACHER PARTICIPANT CONSENT LETTER (ENGLISH VERSION) 118
APPENDIX D.1: INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT 1 (ENGLISH VERSION) 119
APPENDIX D.2: INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT 2 (ENGLISH VERSION) 121
APPENDIX D.3: INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT 3 (ENGLISH VERSION) 123
APPENDIX D.4: INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT 4 (ENGLISH VERSION) 125
APPENDIX D.5: INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT 5 (ENGLISH VERSION) 127
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 3.1 The Results of the Preliminary Interviews 35
Table 3.2 Description of the Research Settings 37
Table 3.3 Description of Speaking Section of Family and Friends Special Edition Grade 5 38
Table 3.4 Description of the Research Participants 39
Table 3.5 The Link between Research Questions and Instruments 40
Table 3.6a Description of Questionnaire (Section 2) 42
Table 3.6b Description of Questionnaire (Section 3) 43
Table 3.7 Delivery and Collection Procedure of Questionnaires 45
Table 3.8 Demographic Information of Interviewees 47
Table 4.1a Reliability of the Teacher Questionnaire for Total Items (Items 1-34) 53
Table 4.1b Reliability of the Teacher Questionnaire for Perception Group (Items 1-22) 54
Table 4.1c Reliability of the Teacher Questionnaire for Practice Group (Items 23-34) 54
Table 4.2 Teachers’ Perceptions on Teaching English Speaking Skill at Primary Schools 55
Table 4.3 Teachers’ Perceptions about the Effects of Cooperative Learning Activities on
Students’ Affective States
59
Table 4.4 Teachers’ Perceptions about the Effects of Cooperative Learning Activities on
Students’ Oral Performance
62
Table 4.5 Teachers’ Perceptions about Challenges of Implementing Cooperative Learning
Activities at Primary Schools
66
Table 4.6 Teachers’ Implementation Frequency of Cooperative Learning Activities 70
Table 4.7 The Types of the Actually Implemented Cooperative Learning Activities 73
Table 4.8 The Principles for Implementing Cooperative Learning Activities in Actuality 77
x
LIST OF CHARTS, FIGURES
Page
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework 30
Figure 3.1 Research Procedure 34
Chart 4.1 The Teachers’ Implementation Frequency of Cooperative Learning Activities 71
1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study
Speaking in a second language, involving a complicated process of constructing
meaning, has been deemed to be the most challenging of four language skills (CelceMurcia & Olshtain, 2000). It is implied that speaking skill is the most important
productive skill to be mastered when people learn English language, covering almost all
of language components. Language learners can express their minds, ideas, and thought
freely and spontaneously through speaking process. In addition, purpose of teaching
speaking is to orient both the teachers and students to utilize the target language as a
means of communication in teaching-learning process even in their daily life.
Alternatively saying, speaking involves producing language rather than receiving it. We
usually speak to communicate with others by expressing all what we have in our mind
using different strategies. It also comprises producing words to ask and answer questions,
ask for information and repetition, self-correction, turn-taking in a conversation, greet
people, tell stories, etc. (Spratt, Pulverness, & Williams, 2011).
Marcela and Rodrigo (2014) posit that driving students to use the target language
orally at an early stage remains one of the biggest issues that English teachers confront.
In other words, oral production can be extremely difficult for young learners like primary
students. It is generally accepted that knowing a language and being able to speak it are
not homogeneous because speaking is a productive skill which must be acquired,
developed and practiced both inside and outside the language classroom. Unfortunately,
the majority of students of English have many difficulties to speak it and use it whether
inside or outside the classroom and this weak production may be a result of many reasons
but the most important one is because of the lack of practice of the language, especially at
primary school contexts (Alimi, 2015).
2
According to Ur (1996), one of many factors that cause difficulty in developing
primary students‟ speaking skill is their low or uneven participation. In other words, only
one participant can talk at a time because of large classes and the tendency of some
learners to dominate, while others speak very little or not at all (Hosni, 2014). Besides,
this author also points other reasons causing difficulties in primary students‟ oral
production, including Inhibition (i.e., students are worried about making mistakes, fearful
of criticism, or simply shy); and Nothing to say (i.e., students have no motive to express
themselves). Furthermore, while teachers seem to mostly talk and act as the only source
of knowledge to students, their young students become passive receivers of language
inputs in their learning process at the primary school context (Ning, 2011). In fact, young
learners must learn by practicing not merely listening passively, they must put themselves
in problems and find out their solutions by themselves. They should be provided with a
supportive environment in order to sharpen and bring to lime light their oral skills
(Chickering & Gamson, 1987). The lack of a target language environment for oral
practice can be considered another problem, which of course results from a lack of
involvement in real-life situations. Children need both to participate in communication
and to build up knowledge and skills for participation in order to learn speaking skills
(Cameron, 2001). The fact that language is best learned when the learners‟ attention is
focused on understanding, saying and doing something with language, and not when their
attention is focused explicitly on linguistic features (Kumaravadivelu, 2003).
Given the alarming situation above, teachers of English as a foreign language
(EFL) are in a constant search of what may help their learners increase their level of
language proficiency because using the language in class frequently should be through
active participation techniques and procedures, by using the appropriate method to
enhance the learners level of language fluency, in the same line with what Atma (2010)
concluded in his paper. Moreover, teaching a foreign language is an interactive process,
which involves active participation of both teachers and learners since language is
learned best when students interact with each other in groups. In doing so, Cooperative
3
Learning activities have been proved to be an effective teaching strategy to the language
learners. The implementation of Cooperative Learning activities in teaching speaking has
been the subject of extensive research (Liang, 2000; Zhang, 2010; Soraya, 2010;
Maldonado, Banoy & Quinche, 2011; Pattanpichet, 2011; Attamimi, 2014; Marcela &
Rodrigo, 2014; Alimi, 2015). This big portion of studies indicates that the use of
Cooperative Learning activities can lead to positive attitudes towards language learning
and increased oral productions. Once again, Cooperative Learning activities, which differ
from activities under traditional learning methods, have some benefits generating from
social interaction among students. It has been documented that students could achieve
better oral skills in most cases if they interact and speak together frequently than those
who always remain their silence and passivity in their classrooms. Pair work and group
work actually can bring out a lot of benefits to all young learners. To give some
examples, the young learners learn from and with one another until they actively
participate in interactive tasks; they can learn to clarify and revise their thoughts and to
work out their ideas by working within groups. Alimi (2015) also emphasizes that
Cooperative Learning activities help develop students‟ self-confidence and reduce their
classroom inhibition and anxiety to make them speak and participate easily without fear
of making mistakes, which are considered as hindrances to students‟ speaking skill
development.
1.2. Statement of the Problem
Oral language acquisition is a natural process for children. The ability to speak
grows with age, but it does not entail that such development will automatically lead to
perfection. To speak in more effective ways requires several decisive factors. Ning
(2011) avows that speaking remains the most difficult skill to master for almost all young
learners, and they are still incompetent in communicating orally in English. Therefore, to
be able to communicate in the target language is the main objective of learning process.