Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

TEAM FLY WIRELESS NETWORK DEPLOYMENTS phần 8 ppsx
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Frequency Hopping in GSM Networks 179
used for indirectly adjusting cell parameters. The Dropped Call Ratio is an
counter available from the Operations and Maintenance (OMC) for off-line
processing of statistics. The Dropped Call Ratio has been traditionally used
in the performance monitoring and optimization of cellular systems. This
indicator is also closely linked to the Radio Link Time-out (RLT) which is
determined by the decoding failure rate of the SACCH frames. Although
widely used, the indicator only indirectly represents the performance of the
Traffic Channel (TCH). Therefore in certain frequency reuse scenarios, it
cannot always provide accurate indication of the TCH quality.
Both RXQUAL and FER can be measured simultaneously with Test
Mobile equipment and at the BTS with A-bis Call Trace measurement
facilities. These are special arrangements that are needed in the optimization
stages because the behavior of RXQUAL with Frequency Hopping is
different to non-hopped systems. One way to show this is to plot the system
reported Dropped Call Ratio against the number of events where the
RXQUAL exceeds a threshold level e.g. RXQUAL greater than 5 in a cell.
This gives an area-wide impression of the call quality, which involves many
mobiles and reflects the true behavior for the RXQUAL parameter: The cell
parameters in GSM are defined on a per cell basis and the RF optimization is
performed by adjusting the thresholds for these parameters in terms of the
reported parameters e.g. RXQUAL and RXLEV. The drive tests are useful
to build a detailed log of the behavior in known problem areas. The plot in
Figure 2 shows that the Dropped Call Ratio against the percentage of bad
quality of calls, defined as the events where RXQUAL exceeds 5. The
observed data confirms that the Dropped Call Ratio does not have a strong
dependence on bad quality defined by the RXQUAL threshold. This
behavior is due to the averaging effects of interference in Frequency
Hopping systems.
Interference Averaging
Carrier frequency hopping causes interference from close-in and far-off
mobiles to change with each hop. This means that a mobile continually
suffering severe interference in a non-hopped case would be expected to
experience lower interference due to the statistical averaging effect. The
significance of this effect expressed in a simplified way translates to:
• The average interference during a call is lower and the average call
quality is improved.
• The standard deviation of the interference is expected to become less, as
the extreme events are fewer per call. For the same C/I outage the
interference margin is reduced resulting in a lower C/I threshold.
180 Chapter 9
This lower C/I cannot be directly mapped into a planning threshold. A
determination of the quality threshold in terms of Frame Erasure Rate (FER)
is a prerequisite as it is directly related to voice quality. This means that
standard planning tools do not accurately reflect practical network quality
and the frequency plans produced cannot be depended upon to evaluate
capacity.
Voice Quality and FER
The quality gain is not directly related to the mean C/I. This is because a
certain mean C/I can result in different Frame Erasure Rates (FER) and
unlike the non-hopped case where there is a unique mapping between the
two parameters. The interference averaging causes the C/I distribution to
change in a way that short term C/I are individually related to each FER, and
the mean C/I can be identified with more than one FER distribution. This
relationship has been observed in detailed system simulations based on snapshot locations of mobiles over a large area and by assuming different traffic
intensity per mobile. A sample result from simulations based on a
homogeneous network of 50 sites covering an area of approximately 1500
square km, uniform offered traffic intensity of 25mE per mobile and
spectrum allocation of 36 carriers is shown in Figure 3. The effects of
downlink power control and Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) were
modeled in these simulations.
TEAMFLY
Team-Fly®