Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Tài liệu Báo cáo khoa học: Control analysis as a tool to understand the formation of the las operon
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Control analysis as a tool to understand the formation
of the las operon in Lactococcus lactis
Brian Koebmann, Christian Solem and Peter Ruhdal Jensen
Microbial Physiology and Genetics, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
Over the last three decades increasing attention has
been paid to how metabolic pathways are controlled.
Metabolic control analysis [1,2] has been applied successfully to determine the flux control of many single
enzymes [3–7], but much less attention has been paid
to determine flux control by individual enzymes
cotranscribed in prokaryotic operons.
In Lactococcus lactis, an industrially important
organism used extensively in the fermentation of dairy
products, the three glycolytic enzymes phosphofructokinase (PFK), pyruvate kinase (PK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are clustered in the so-called las
operon [8]. This organization of glycolytic genes is
unique and has given rise to speculation that the three
enzymes might play an important role in the control
and regulation of lactic acid production by this organism. We have previously shown that small changes
in the activity of PFK result in pronounced changes in
metabolite pools, glycolytic flux and growth rate in
L. lactis, but control by PFK has not been quantified
[9]. LDH was shown to have no control over either
growth or glycolytic flux at wild-type levels, but a
strong negative control over the minor flux to mixed
acids via pyruvate formate lyase (PFL) [10].
In this study, the activities of PFK and PK were
modulated individually by changing expression of the
Keywords
glycolysis; Lactococcus; las; metabolic
control analysis; operon
Correspondence
P. R. Jensen, Microbial Physiology and
Genetics, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical
University of Denmark, Building 301,
DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Tel: +45 4525 2510
Fax: +45 4593 2809
E-mail: [email protected]
(Received 23 December 2004, revised 28
February 2005, accepted 9 March 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04656.x
In Lactococcus lactis the enzymes phosphofructokinase (PFK), pyruvate
kinase (PK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are uniquely encoded in the
las operon. We used metabolic control analysis to study the role of this
organization. Earlier studies have shown that, at wild-type levels, LDH has
no control over glycolysis and growth rate, but high negative control over
formate production (CJformate
LDH ¼ 1:3). We found that PFK and PK exert no
control over glycolysis and growth rate at wild-type enzyme levels but both
enzymes exert strong positive control on the glycolytic flux at reduced
activities. PK exerts high positive control over formate (CJformate
PK ¼ 0:9 1:1)
and acetate production (CJacetate
PK ¼ 0:8 1:0), whereas PFK exerts no control
over these fluxes at increased expression. Decreased expression of the entire
las operon resulted in a strong decrease in the growth rate and glycolytic
flux; at 53% expression of the las operon glycolytic flux was reduced to
44% and the flux control coefficient increased towards 3. Increased las
expression resulted in a slight decrease in the glycolytic flux. At wild-type
levels, control was close to zero on both glycolysis and the pyruvate branches. The sum of control coefficients for the three enzymes individually
was comparable with the control coefficient found for the entire operon;
the strong positive control exerted by PK almost cancels out the negative
control exerted by LDH on formate production. Our analysis suggests that
coregulation of PFK and PK provides a very efficient way to regulate glycolysis, and coregulating PK and LDH allows cells to maintain homolactic
fermentation during glycolysis regulation.
Abbreviations
LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; PFL, pyruvate formate lyase; PK, pyruvate kinase.
2292 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2292–2303 ª 2005 FEBS