Siêu thị PDFTải ngay đi em, trời tối mất

Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến

Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật

© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Tài liệu Aging Research in Yeast doc
PREMIUM
Số trang
378
Kích thước
10.7 MB
Định dạng
PDF
Lượt xem
1709

Tài liệu Aging Research in Yeast doc

Nội dung xem thử

Mô tả chi tiết

Aging Research in Yeast

SUBCELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY

SERIES EDITOR

J. ROBIN HARRIS, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

ASSISTANT EDITORS

B.B. BISWAS, University of Calcutta, Calcutta, India

P. QUINN, King’s College London, London, UK

Recent Volumes in this Series

Volume 41 Chromatic and Disease

Edited by Tapas K. Kundu and Dipak Dasgupta

Volume 42 Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Disease

Edited by Randall E. Harris

Volume 43 Subcellular Proteomics

Edited by Eric Bertrand and Michel Faupel

Volume 44 Peroxiredoxin Systems

Edited by Leopold Folhé and J. Robin Harris

Volume 45 Calcium Signalling and Disease

Edited by Ernesto Carafoli and Marisa Brini

Volume 46 Creatine and Creatine Kinase in Health and Disease

Edited by Gajja S. Salomons and Markus Wyss

Volume 47 Molecular Mechanisms of Parasite Invasion

Edited by Barbara A. Burleigh and Dominique Soldati-Favre

Volume 48 The Cronin Family of Proteins

Edited by Christoph S. Clemen and Ludwig Eichinger

Volume 49 Lipids in Health and Disease

Edited by Peter J. Quinn and Xiaoyuan Wang

Volume 50 Genome Stability and Human Diseases

Edited by Heinz-Peter Nasheuer

Volume 51 Cholesterol Binding and Cholesterol Transport Proteins

Edited by Robin J. Harris

Volume 52 A Handbook of Transcription Factors

Edited by Tim Hughes

Volume 53 Endotoxins: Stricture, Function and Recognition

Edited by Xiaoyuan Wang and Peter J. Quinn

Volume 54 Conjugation and Deconjugation of Ubiquitin Family Modifiers

Edited by Marcus Groettrup

Volume 55 Purinergic Regulation of Respiratory Diseases

Edited by Maryse Picher and Richard C. Boucher

Volume 56 Water Soluble Vitamins

Edited by Olaf Stanger

Michael Breitenbach · S. Michal Jazwinski ·

Peter Laun

Editors

Aging Research in Yeast

123

Editors

Prof. Dr. Michael Breitenbach

Department of Cell Biology

University of Salzburg

Hellbrunnerstrasse 34

5020 Salzburg

Austria

[email protected]

Prof. S. Michal Jazwinski

Department of Medicine

Tulane University Health Sciences Center

Tulane Center for Aging

Tulane University

1430 Tulane Avenue SL-12

New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

USA

[email protected]

Dr. Peter Laun

Department of Cell Biology

University of Salzburg

Hellbrunnerstrasse 34

5020 Salzburg

Austria

[email protected]

ISSN 0306-0225

ISBN 978-94-007-2560-7 e-ISBN 978-94-007-2561-4

DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2561-4

Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York

Library of Congress Control Number: 2011940010

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by

any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written

permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose

of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.

Printed on acid-free paper

Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)

INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY EDITORIAL BOARD

R. Bittman, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, USA

D. Dasgupt, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Calcutta, India

A. Holzenburg, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA

S. Rottem, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

M. Wyss, DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., Basel, Switzerland

Contents

1 Introduction ............................... 1

Michael Breitenbach, Peter Laun, and S. Michal Jazwinski

2 Oxidative Stresses and Ageing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

May T. Aung-Htut, Anita Ayer, Michael Breitenbach,

and Ian W. Dawes

3 The Role of Mitochondria in the Aging Processes of Yeast . . . . . 55

Michael Breitenbach, Peter Laun, J. Richard Dickinson,

Andrea Klocker, Mark Rinnerthaler, Ian W. Dawes,

May T. Aung-Htut, Lore Breitenbach-Koller,

Antonio Caballero, Thomas Nyström, Sabrina Büttner,

Tobias Eisenberg, Frank Madeo, and Markus Ralser

4 The Retrograde Response and Other Pathways

of Interorganelle Communication in Yeast Replicative Aging . . . . 79

S. Michal Jazwinski

5 Chronological Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . . . . . . . . . . 101

Valter D. Longo and Paola Fabrizio

6 Aging and the Survival of Quiescent and Non-quiescent

Cells in Yeast Stationary-Phase Cultures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

M. Werner-Washburne, Sushmita Roy, and George S. Davidson

7 Maximising the Yeast Chronological Lifespan . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

Peter W. Piper

8 Amino Acid Homeostasis and Chronological Longevity

in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

John P. Aris, Laura K. Fishwick, Michelle L. Marraffini,

Arnold Y. Seo, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, and William A. Dunn Jr.

9 DNA Damage and DNA Replication Stress in Yeast Models

of Aging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187

William C. Burhans and Martin Weinberger

vii

viii Contents

10 Yeast Aging and Apoptosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

Peter Laun, Sabrina Büttner, Mark Rinnerthaler,

William C. Burhans, and Michael Breitenbach

11 Cellular Homeostasis in Fungi: Impact on the Aging Process . . . . 233

Christian Q. Scheckhuber, Andrea Hamann, Diana Brust,

and Heinz D. Osiewacz

12 Genome-Wide Analysis of Yeast Aging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251

George L. Sutphin, Brady A. Olsen, Brian K. Kennedy,

and Matt Kaeberlein

13 Genetic Approaches to Aging in Budding and Fission

Yeasts: New Connections and New Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . 291

Bo-Ruei Chen and Kurt W. Runge

14 Evolution of Asymmetric Damage Segregation:

A Modelling Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315

Armin Rashidi, Thomas B.L. Kirkwood, and Daryl P. Shanley

15 Cellular Ageing and the Actin Cytoskeleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331

David Amberg, Jane E. Leadsham, Vasillios Kotiadis,

and Campbell W. Gourlay

Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353

Contributors

David Amberg Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY

Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA, [email protected]

John P. Aris Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida,

Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, USA, [email protected]

May T. Aung-Htut School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,

University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia,

[email protected]

Anita Ayer School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of

New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, [email protected]

Michael Breitenbach Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology,

University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria, [email protected]

Lore Breitenbach-Koller Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology,

University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria,

[email protected]

Diana Brust Faculty of Biosciences, Institute of Molecular Biosciences and

Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes, Johann Wolfgang Goethe

University, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, [email protected]

William C. Burhans Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell

Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA, [email protected]

Sabrina Büttner Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz,

Austria, [email protected]

Antonio Caballero MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Guy’s

Campus, King’s College London, London, UK, [email protected]

Bo-Ruei Chen Department of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School

of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA, [email protected]

ix

x Contributors

George S. Davidson Department of Biology, University of New Mexico,

Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA, [email protected]

Ian W. Dawes School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of

New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, [email protected]

J. Richard Dickinson Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Systems Biology

Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK,

[email protected]

William A. Dunn Jr. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of

Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, USA, [email protected]

Tobias Eisenberg Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz,

Austria, [email protected]

Paola Fabrizio Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, UMR5239 CNRS,

Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France, [email protected]

Laura K. Fishwick Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of

Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, USA, [email protected]

Campbell W. Gourlay Kent Fungal Group, School of Biosciences, University of

Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK, [email protected]

Andrea Hamann Faculty of Biosciences, Institute of Molecular Biosciences and

Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes, Johann Wolfgang Goethe

University, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, [email protected]

S. Michal Jazwinski Department of Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences

Center, Tulane Center for Aging, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112,

USA, [email protected]

Matt Kaeberlein Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle,

WA 98195-7470, USA, [email protected]

Brian K. Kennedy Buck Institute, Novato, CA 94945, USA,

[email protected]

Thomas B.L. Kirkwood Institute for Ageing and Health, Campus for Ageing and

Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK,

[email protected]

Andrea Klocker Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology, University of

Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria, [email protected]

Vasillios Kotiadis Kent Fungal Group, School of Biosciences, University of Kent,

Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK, [email protected]

Peter Laun Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology, University of

Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria, [email protected]

Contributors xi

Jane E. Leadsham Kent Fungal Group, School of Biosciences, University of

Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NJ, UK, [email protected]

Christiaan Leeuwenburgh Department of Aging and Geriatric Research,

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2610, USA, [email protected]

Valter D. Longo Department of Biological Sciences, Andrus Gerontology Center,

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0191, USA,

[email protected]

Frank Madeo Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz,

Austria, [email protected]

Michelle L. Marraffini Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of

Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, USA, [email protected]

Thomas Nyström Department of Cell and Molecular Biology (CMB), University

of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]

Brady A. Olsen Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

98195-7470, USA, [email protected]

Heinz D. Osiewacz Faculty of Biosciences, Institute of Molecular Biosciences

and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes, Johann Wolfgang Goethe

University, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, [email protected]

Peter W. Piper Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The

University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK, [email protected]

Markus Ralser Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany,

[email protected]

Armin Rashidi Institute for Ageing and Health, Campus for Ageing and Vitality,

Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK, [email protected]

Mark Rinnerthaler Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology,

University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria, [email protected]

Sushmita Roy Broad Institute, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142,

USA, [email protected]

Kurt W. Runge Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute,

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA,

[email protected]

Christian Q. Scheckhuber Faculty of Biosciences, Institute of Molecular

Biosciences and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes, Johann

Wolfgang Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany,

[email protected]

xii Contributors

Arnold Y. Seo Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida,

Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, USA, [email protected]

Daryl P. Shanley Institute for Ageing and Health, Campus for Ageing and

Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK,

[email protected]

George L. Sutphin Department of Pathology and the Molecular and Cellular

Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7470, USA,

[email protected]

Martin Weinberger Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell

Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA,

[email protected]

M. Werner-Washburne Department of Biology, University of New Mexico,

Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA, [email protected]

Chapter 1

Introduction

Michael Breitenbach, Peter Laun, and S. Michal Jazwinski

Abstract Aging in yeast is now a well researched area with hundreds of new

research and review papers appearing every year. The chapters following in this

book written by some of the leading experts in the field will give an overview of

the most relevant areas of yeast aging. The purpose of this chapter is to give the

newcomer an introduction to the field including some basic technical questions.

Keywords Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Replicative aging · Rejuvenation ·

Asymmetric segregation · Stem cells

General Introductory Remarks

Cells of the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, have for several decades now been con￾sidered as the prototypic eukaryotic cells, ideally suited to study and uncover many

of the basic phenomena of eukaryotic life. This is because of the unrivaled ease

and speed of genetic and molecular genetic analysis in yeast, the small genome size

(12 Mbp), the short doubling time (80 min on complex media), a fully developed

system of sexual reproduction with stable haploid as well as diploid phases enabling

complementation as well as recombination analysis (Dickinson and Schweizer

2004; Stansfield and Stark 2007).

Methods of “reverse genetics” are efficient and easy to handle making yeast one

of only two model organisms of aging where exact gene replacement resulting in

“knock in” strains can be routinely performed. The other cell type where this can

routinely be achieved at present, although with a much higher investment of time and

money, is ES cells of the mouse. In this way, any desired mutation can be introduced

at will in haploid cells in the about 4800 non-essential yeast genes. In the remaining

about 1200 “essential” yeast genes, the same is true, but a severe loss of function

would lead to death, and these mutations have to be kept in a heterozygous state.

Knowing the yeast whole genome sequence and the functional annotation of

yeast genes which has taken place over the last 15 years, and using high throughput

M. Breitenbach (B)

Division of Genetics, Department of Cell Biology,

University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

e-mail: [email protected]

M. Breitenbach et al. (eds.), Aging Research in Yeast, Subcellular Biochemistry 57, 1

DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2561-4_1, C Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

2 M. Breitenbach et al.

methods and the many publicly available mutant and gene collections, including

cDNA microarrays, whole genome screening procedures have become a powerful

tool for yeast genetic research and have also been used for aging research.

However, of course, not every aspect of eukaryotic life can be modeled in yeast

and an obvious example is development and cell differentiation, which exists in

yeast, but is much more complex in higher multicellular organisms.

The questions which we are asking here are: are the cellular aging processes of

yeast which are described in this book, relevant and similar in mechanism to the

cellular aging processes observed in cultured higher cells and in higher organisms?

What can we learn from yeast aging that is relevant to understand the aging pro￾cesses of higher organisms? Can this lead to interventions in the aging process of

humans that improve the lifespan and health span of humans? In order to answer

these questions, we must understand the molecular genetic pathways relevant to

aging both in yeast and in higher organisms and we have to compare the two systems

with special emphasis on highly conserved genes playing a role in those path￾ways. Highly conserved genes, pathways, and external interventions would point

to “public mechanisms of aging”, while such genes and pathways that are found to

influence aging only in a restricted number of organisms, are called “private mecha￾nisms of aging” (Martin et al. 1996). One example for a public mechanism is caloric

restriction (Jiang et al. 2000; Kaeberlein et al. 2005) while an example for a private

mechanism of aging is provided by the extrachromosomal circles of ribosomal DNA

(ERCs) (Sinclair and Guarente 1997) in yeast mother cell-specific aging. The model

systems for organismic aging of higher organisms which are most highly developed

are the mouse (important because it is so closely related to humans), Drosophila

melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Yeast supplies us with two independent aging models which both have similar￾ities to cellular aging processes in humans but have little to do with each other in

terms of the genes which are involved (Laun et al. 2006). The main purpose of this

Introduction is to present these two aging processes, to compare them with each

other, and to evaluate them with regard to the aging processes in the human body

for which they are claimed to be models.

Mother Cell-Specific (Replicative) Aging of Yeast Cells

Individual yeast cells of standard laboratory strains can produce only a limited num￾ber, typically 20–30, daughter cells during a lifetime (Mortimer and Johnston 1959).

This process takes about 2–3 days on complex media at 28◦C and is therefore one

of the most rapid aging processes known. The lifespan of a cell is counted in gen￾erations (buds, daughter cells produced), but not in calendar time and is actually

independent of calendar time (Müller et al. 1980). During the process, the mother

cell becomes bigger with every generation and accumulates bud scars (Fig. 1.1).

Mother cells change gradually in cycle duration (Egilmez and Jazwinski 1989) and

many other biochemical parameters like ROS content (Laun et al. 2001) and protein

carbonyl content (Aguilaniu et al. 2003), until they reach a final state of senescence

Tải ngay đi em, còn do dự, trời tối mất!