Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Job crafting and employees’ general health the role of work–nonwork facilitation and perceived
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Shi et al. BMC Public Health (2022) 22:1196
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13569-z
RESEARCH
Job crafting and employees’ general
health: the role of work–nonwork facilitation
and perceived boundary control
Yanwei Shi1†, Dan Li2†, Nan Zhang3
, Ping Jiang4*, Deng Yuling5*, Julan Xie6 and Jun Yang2
Abstract
Background: Job crafting is associated with positive work–related outcomes, but its efects on nonwork–related
outcomes are unclear. The conservation of resources theory informed the hypotheses that work–nonwork facilitation mediates the relationship between job crafting and general health, and this mediation process is moderated by
perceived boundary control.
Methods: Using a two–wave design, 383 employees from a range of work settings completed questionnaires in
which they rated job crafting, work–nonwork facilitation, general health and perceived boundary control.
Results: Moderated mediation analysis showed that work–nonwork facilitation mediated the relationship between
job crafting and employee general health. Further, perceived boundary control moderated this indirect efect, such
that the indirect efect was stronger for employees with high perceived boundary control than those with low perceived boundary control.
Conclusions: This study is an important step forward in understanding the efect of job crafting on nonwork
domains, and in clarifying “how” and “when” job crafting might afect employees’ general health. Further, the results
have practical implications for fostering employee general health.
Keywords: Conservation of resources theory, General health, Job crafting, Perceived boundary control, Work–
nonwork facilitation
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco
mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background
In times of rapid organizational change, employees often
need to take initiative to change the conditions of their
existing jobs [1, 2]. Job crafting, which refers to self–initiated changes in one’s job or workplace, has received
increasing attention from researchers and practitioners
[3, 4]. Job crafting involves changes that employees make
in their job demands and job resources to attain and/
or optimize their personal or work goals, such as seeking social support and starting new projects [2]. Tims
et al. suggested that it has four dimensions: increasing
structural job resources, increasing social job resources,
increasing challenging job demands, and decreasing
hindering job demands [2]. Job crafting appears to have
a positive efect on various work–related attitudes and
behaviors, such as improved job performance [5, 6],
increased work engagement [6, 7], work meaningfulness
[8], and job satisfaction [9, 10].
However, compared to the extensive literature on the
efect of job crafting on work–related outcomes [6, 8,
Open Access
†
Yanwei Shi and Dan Li contributed equally to the study. They should be
regarded as joint frst authors.
*Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]
4
Department of Nursing, Shanghai Pudong New area People’s Hospital,
Shanghai 201299, China 5
Health Management Center, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South
University, Changsha 410083, China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article