Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

GIS Methodologies for Developing Conservation Strategies Part 7 doc
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
140 Lambert and Carr
hoped that analysis and mapping of a corridor network would assist Central
American governments and nongovernmental organizations in the identification
and prioritization of key areas for preservation and protection. A spin-off benefit
of this project is a preliminary GIS database of the entire Central American
isthmus which has been shared with many government agencies in Central
America, other scientists, land use planners, and conservation organizations
that are also working to preserve and manage the natural treasures of Central
America.
Database Development and Evaluation
The GIS database development component of the corridor study was designed
as a two-phase process to complement the preliminary and more detailed analysis efforts. Initially, due to limited funding, only the data layers that were required to support the preliminary corridor potential study would be developed.
Subsequently, with additional funding, the team would develop more comprehensive databases to support more detailed study of specific potential linkages.
The logical first step for the team was the identification and collection of
existing digital data sources that could be obtained inexpensively. Unfortunately,
the team found that, although there were several GIS projects being conducted
in Central America, the GIS databases these projects were creating varied widely
in scale, projection, content, theme, date, and digital format. There were apparently no regional efforts being made to develop a standardized database for the
entire isthmus.
Fortunately, an affordable source for base map features called the Digital
Chart of the World (DCW) had just become available (ESRI 1993). The DCW
provides base map features such as roads, hydrography, political boundaries,
population centers, and topography (at 1,000-foot intervals) for the entire world.
This database was created by digitizing the U.S. Defense Mapping Agency’s
1:1,000,000 scale Operational Navigation Chart map series. A license for the
ARC/INFO version of the DCW database was purchased from Environmental
Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) in the fall of 1992. At first, the team was
skeptical about the suitability of this database because the scale of the source
data limits typical spatial accuracy to approximately plus/minus one kilometer.
However, the alternative of digitizing base map features for all of Central
America motivated the team to test the database. After working with the database, the team found the DCW’s spatial and attribute accuracy to be quite
adequate and appropriate for the objectives of this preliminary, multinational
study.
An important point to make about the DCW is that its availability allowed
The Paseo Pantera Project 141
the planning team to concentrate its own limited funding on the generation of
the new databases required for analysis and on the preliminary design of the
corridor rather than on the digitizing of base map feature layers. However, a
second important advantage to using the DCW was that it allowed the team to
get off to a quick start. All too often in the past, ambitious GIS managers have
promoted this technology successfully to their cautious colleagues, only to find
themselves explaining later, to now impatient colleagues, why it takes so long to
demonstrate any substantial results from a technology that was supposed to save
time and increase productivity. Being aware of this potential scenario, and the
fact that GIS technology and methods are still new to many of the participants in
the Paseo Pantera project (especially some of the cooperating institutions in
Central America), the corridor planning team recognized the need to demonstrate the utility of GIS as quickly as possible to its sponsors. The DCW made this
possible. Although the DCW will not be appropriate for all projects, this project
demonstrates the potential value of the DCW to those faced with continentalscale environmental problems and dwindling budgets.
The second step in the initial phase of GIS database development involved
the team in a process of weighing the costs of producing each new data layer
against the relative potential contribution of that data to the preliminary analysis.
Several new data layers were subsequently developed, including boundaries
of existing and proposed protected areas; forested/deforested areas; potential
biological communities based on the Holdridge system of life zone classifications
(Holdridge 1967); population density and major population centers; and areas
occupied by indigenous populations. The GIS data layers listed above represent
the conversion of more than seventy-five source maps to digital format. It is
important to point out that these data sets represent only a preliminary effort,
limited by modest funding, and that the study team recognizes the need for
much more detailed information as it enters the second phase of this study.
Once the databases described above were developed, the team explored ways
to use them to analyze the potential for a continuous biological corridor. The
following four criteria were selected for use in the model based on the evaluation
of the available data: (1) size of protected areas, (2) uniform national designation
of protected areas, (3) population densities, and (4) forested/deforested areas.
The protected areas were divided into two size classes—large (50,000 hectares
and greater) and small (less than 50,000 hectares). These classes were based on
suggestions for minimum core area size in Noss (1991).
Because of the variations in terminology used by each country to classify its
protected areas, the team developed a set of “uniform national designations”
based on current management practices. These designations were: national park
(or equivalent), anthropological reserve, extractive reserve, private reserve, and
proposed reserve. “Uniform national designation” was selected as an important
criterion because the management practices used in each protected area deter-