Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Factors affecting brand authenticity in F and B industry in Vietnam – A case study of Starbucks in Ho Chi Minh city: Bachelor thesis of Business adminstration / Le Pham Dang Khoa ; supervisor Tran Van Dat
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
THE STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
HO CHI MINH BANKING UNIVERSITY
**********
LE PHAM DANG KHOA
FACTORS AFFECTING BRAND AUTHENTICITY IN F&B INDUSTRY IN
VIETNAM – A CASE STUDY OF STARBUCKS IN HO CHI MINH CITY
BACHELOR’S THESIS
MAJOR: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
CODE: 52340101
HO CHI MINH CITY, 09/2021
THE STATE BANK OF VIETNAM
HO CHI MINH BANKING UNIVERSITY
**********
LE PHAM DANG KHOA
FACTORS AFFECTING BRAND AUTHENTICITY IN F&B INDUSTRY IN
VIETNAM – A CASE STUDY OF STARBUCKS IN HO CHI MINH CITY
BACHELOR’S THESIS
MAJOR: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
CODE: 52340101
SUPERVISIOR: MR. TRAN VAN DAT
HO CHI MINH CITY, 2021
ABSTRACT
The main purpose of this study is to find out which factors affecting brand
authenticity in F&B industry by concentrating on Starbucks. For this purpose, a
conceptual model was developed based on other research models.
The study had collected data by conducting 200 surveys online in Ho Chi Minh
City. The author use SPSS 20 software to do analysises have show the results that
Uniqueness, Scarcity, Longitudinal Consistency, Longevity, Brand legitimacy and
Employee‟s passion are 6 factors that have positive influence on brand authenticy of
Starbucks.
This results study could be used as a reference for further research and for
Entrepreneurs, Marketing managers, or businessman to have a concept about the
brand authenticity therefore make plans to build authenticity to have a more
competitive position.
DECLARATION
I declare that the thesis "Factors affecting brand authenticity in F&B industry in
Vietnam – A case study of Starbucks in Ho Chi Minh City" is the result of my
research. Except for the references to previous research papers mentioned in the
thesis, the survey data and results of the thesis are genuine and have never been
published before.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The first person I would like to thank is Ph.D. Tran Van Dat who supported me
directly. He has given me lots of valuable advice and suggestions for me to
complete the thesis.
I would like to thank the teachers of the Facility of Business Administration. They
gave me the knowledge and useful experience during the time I was learning at the
university.
I would like to thank my friends from HQ5 – GE11 for sharing, helping me during
my time at school.
I also express my attitude to all my friends who helped me directly or indirectly.
Who answered the survey for my data in this thesis.
Finally, I would like to thank my family, relatives for encouraging me during this
thesis.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Overview of thesis 1
1.1. Introduction 1
1.2. Aim of research 3
1.3. Research object and Research cope 3
1.4. Methodology: 4
1.5. Research structure 4
Chapter 2. Literature review 6
2.1. Authenticity 6
2.1.1. Definition of Authenticity 6
2.1.2. Definitions of different perspectives of authenticity 6
2.2. Brand authenticity 7
2.2.1. Definition of brand authenticity 7
2.2.2. The concept of brand authenticity 8
2.3. Related research 10
2.4. Proposed model 13
2.4.1. Overview Starbucks case 13
2.4.2. Proposed model 14
Chapter 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 19
3.1. Research design 19
3.2. Research methodology 20
3.2.1. Qualitative method: 20
3.2.2. Quantitative method: 21
3.3. Adjusting model research 24
3.4. Building the scale 28
3.4.1. Scale of Uniqueness: 29
3.4.2. Scale of Scarcity 30
3.4.3. Scale of Longevity 31
3.4.4. Scale of Longitudinal Consistency 32
3.4.5. Scale of Brand Legitimacy 33
3.4.6. Scale of Employee‟s passion 34
3.4.7. Scale of Brand authenticity 35
3.5. Data processing methods: 35
3.5.1. Cronbach's alpha analyzing: 35
3.5.2. EFA analyzing: 36
3.5.3. Regression and ANOVA analyzing: 37
Chapter 4. RESEARCH RESULT 39
4.1. Sample descriptions 39
4.2. Reliability coefficients Cronbach‟s Alpha 42
4.2.1. Uniqueness (UQ) 42
4.2.2. Scarcity (SC) 43
4.2.3. Longevity (LG) 44
4.2.4. Longitudinal consistency (LC) 45
4.2.5. Brand Legitimacy (BL) 46
4.2.6. Employee‟s passion (EP) 47
4.2.7. Brand authenticity (BA) 48
4.3. Analyzing EFA (Exploratory Factor Analysis) 49
4.3.1. EFA of independent variables 49
4.3.2. EFA of dependent variable 52
4.4. Comparatives analysis 54
4.5. Analyzing Regression 55
4.6. Determining the difference by the characteristics of the research object 58
4.6.1. Gender differences 58
4.6.2. Age differences 60
4.6.3. Job differences 62
4.6.4. Income differences 64
Chapter 5. Conclusion and managerial implications 67
5.1. Conclusion 67
5.2. Managerial implications 68
5.2.1. Uniqueness 68
5.2.2. Brand legitimacy 69
5.2.3. Longitudinal Consistency 69
5.2.4. Employee‟s passion 70
5.2.5. Scarcity 70
5.2.6. Longevity 71
5.3. Limitation and further research 71
5.3.1. Limitation of thesis 71
5.3.2. Further research 72
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ANOVA Analysis of Variance
EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis
HCMC Ho Chi Minh City
F&B Food and Beverage
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences