Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Explicating Relationship Management as a General Theory of Public Relations
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Explicating Relationship Management as
a General Theory of Public Relations
John A. Ledingham
Department of Communication
Capital University
Although the relationship management perspective of public relations is the focus of
a substantial body of scholarship, a theory of that perspective has yet to be articulated
and explicated. Herein, I review the emergence of the relational perspective, summarize the relevant literature, and construct a theoretical statement of that perspective. I
then argue for relationship management as a general theory of public relations and offer suggestions for future research within a relational paradigm.
The relationship management perspective holds that public relations balances
the interests of organizations and publics through the management of organization–public relationships. Within that perspective, public relations is seen as “the
management function that establishes and maintains mutually beneficial relationships between an organization and the publics on whom its success or failure
depends” (Cutlip, Center, & Broom, 1994, p. 2). The relational perspective has
been explored in the context of various public relations functions, including public affairs (Ledingham, 2001a), community relations (Ledingham & Bruning,
2001), issues management (Bridges & Nelson, 2000), crisis management
(Coombs, 2000), and media relations (Ledingham & Bruning, 1998b, 1999).
Moreover, the notion of relationship management is consistent with major theoretical concepts such as systems theory and the two-way symmetrical model of
J. E. Grunig and Hunt (1984) and also accommodates relevant middle-range theories. Despite a growing body of scholarship focused on the relational perspective, some have suggested that the concept has yet to be articulated in a theoretical statement that then can be examined in terms of accepted criteria for theory
building (Broom, Casey, & Ritchey, 1997, 2000). Such a statement, grounded in
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 15(2), 181–198
Copyright © 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Requests for reprints should be sent to John A. Ledingham, College of Arts and Sciences, Capital
University, Columbus, OH 43209–2394. E-mail: [email protected]