Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Escape fire
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page i
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page ii
.................................
Escape Fire
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page iii
.................................
Donald M. Berwick
Introduction by Frank Davidoff, MD
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page iv
.................................
Escape Fire
Designs for the
Future of Health Care
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page v
Copyright © 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Published by Jossey-Bass
A Wiley Imprint
989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.josseybass.com
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning,
or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States
Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center,
Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or
on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be
addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street,
Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, e-mail:
Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact JosseyBass directly, call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739,
outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.
Jossey-Bass also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that
appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Berwick, Donald M. (Donald Mark), 1946–
Escape fire: designs for the future of health care / Donald M. Berwick; introduction
by FrankDavidoff.
p. ; cm.
Keynote speeches presented at the annual National Forum on Quality Improvement
in Health Care, 1992–2002.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-7879-7217-7
1. Health care reform—United States. 2. Health services administration—United
States. 3. Medical care—United States—Quality control. 4. Patient advocacy—
United States.
[DNLM: 1. Delivery of Health Care—trends—United States—Collected Works.
2. Organizational Innovation—United States—Collected Works. 4. Quality of Health
Care—trends—United States—Collected Works. W 84 AA1 B49e 2004] I. Institute
for Healthcare Improvement. National Forum. II. Title
RA395.A3B47 2004
362.1'0425—dc22 2003021193
Printed in the United States of America
FIRST EDITION
HB Printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ffirs.qxd 10/17/03 8:59 AM Page vi
.................................
Contents
Preface ix
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction xix
Frank Davidoff, MD
1. Kevin Speaks 1
2. Buckling Down to Change 11
3. Quality Comes Home 43
4. Run to Space 61
5. Sauerkraut, Sobriety, and the 93
Spread of Change
6. Why the Vasa Sank 127
7. Eagles and Weasels 155
8. Escape Fire 177
9. Dirty Words and Magic Spells 211
10. Every Single One 239
11. Plenty 269
About the Author 297
About the Commentary Authors 299
Index 305
vii
.....
ftoc.qxd 10/17/03 8:58 AM Page vii
To Ann, with thanks, for love and courage
ftoc.qxd 10/17/03 8:58 AM Page viii
Preface .................................
To read these eleven speeches in one sitting, as I have now done,
makes me dizzy. They pass before me at a speed disrespectful of the
difficult decade they mark.
When I gave the first speech in this collection, “Kevin Speaks,”
in 1992 in front of sixteen hundred self-starting mavericks, the
Institute for Healthcare Improvement was a young organization
with a handful of employees, and health care had no quality movement at all. Ben, my oldest child, was a high school junior, and Becca,
my youngest, was in first grade. (Ben is now a legislative aide on
Capitol Hill and Becca is a high school senior.) Hillary Clinton was
just about to try to rescue American health care. Avedis Donabedian
and W. Edwards Deming were alive and well. So was my father. My
family had not yet lived for a year in Alaska, or even imagined doing
so. We were all healthy. I ran twenty miles a week, and my wife’s two
years of devastating illness were far in the future. The European
Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care and the Asia Pacific
Forum did not exist. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) had no
quality-of-care agenda on its screen. My hair was full and black.
Ten years later I gave the last speech in this collection, “Plenty,”
in a wholly different world. The National Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care now had four thousand participants. A quality
movement was expanding rapidly on at least three continents. The
ix
.....
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page ix
x PREFACE
Institute for Healthcare Improvement employed seventy people and
worked with more than four hundred faculty members worldwide.
The 8th European Forum on Quality Improvement in Health
Care—with one thousand participants from forty-three nations—
lay just ahead, and the 2nd Asia Pacific Forum—with seven hundred people from twenty-three nations—lay just behind. So did
September 11. Harry Potter had met Voldemort, and my wife, Ann,
was in her long convalescence, walking and working again. Avedis
Donabedian, W. Edwards Deming, and Philip Berwick, my father,
had been laid to rest, each after a long and difficult illness full of
compassion from their caregivers and defects in their care. The IOM
had spoken, in To Err Is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm:
“Between the health care we have and the health care we could
have lies not just a gap, but a chasm.” My right knee was totally
blown and my jogging days were over. My hair had thinned and
turned pure white.
With so much different, why do these speeches strike me as so
repetitive? Metaphor after metaphor, list after list, story after story—
but always the same. Year after year I can find only three messages
at the core: focus on the suffering, build and use knowledge, and cooperate. There is no other suggestion in these pages—all else is fluff
and padding, trying over and over again to make the signal comfortable enough to hear and eloquent enough to remember.
The words hide my impatience. Why is changing health care
so hard?
Why don’t we yet remember more reliably that our work has no
other raison d’être than to relieve pain? In “Kevin Speaks” I wrote,
“We are not here so that our organizations survive; we are here so
that Kevin survives.” Ten years later, recounting the story of a little girl, Alicia, who had cystic fibrosis, and her tireless father, Jim,
I wrote, “We are here today for exactly—one reason—the same as
Jim’s—to make Alicia’s senior prom night romantic.”
Why are science and practice still so far apart? In 1993 I wrote,
“The commitment to improving the match between scientific
..............
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page x
knowledge and actual practice, the commitment to ‘appropriateness,’ must come from the professionals whose actions constitute
care”; and in 2001, “We need to get serious about promising every
patient the benefit of care that draws on the best knowledge available anywhere.”
Why do we continue trying to make great health care out of disconnected, separately perfected fragments instead of weaving the
fabric of experience that our patients need from us? Kevin asked in
1992, “Do you ever talk to each other?” And a decade later I echoed
him in my exhortation, “Cooperation is the highest professional
value of all.”
Though frustrated, I do find comfort in Joseph Juran’s admonition, “The pace of change is majestic.” From that higher perspective, improved results for the vast majority of patients still seem
elusive; but the optimist in me thinks that something momentous—
something substantial, meaningful, and rational—may have, after
all, begun. I do sense a movement—not fast enough yet, but maybe
a little “majestic.” From a fringe collection of oddly placed provocateurs, the advocates of fundamentally changed health care have
joined the mainstream. The IOM reports—To Err Is Human and
Crossing the Quality Chasm—have chartered a whole new wave
of scientifically grounded efforts to improve. A federal agency,
the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), has
changed its name to include “quality” and doubled its budget in
pursuit of that aim. Big federal programs such as the Veterans
Health Administration, the Bureau of Primary Health Care in
the Health Resources and Services Administration, and Medicare
have led the nation in embracing quality improvement aims.
Patient safety, the cutting edge of quality, has front-page status. The
Leapfrog Group—a progressive purchaser consortium in the United
States—is trying to put quality criteria into health care contracting, making quality of care begin to seem like a serious business
issue. Health care quality is now a major theme in medical literature, and both the Joint Commission Journal and the British Medical
Preface xi
.............
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page xi
xii PREFACE
Journal Publishing Group’s journal Quality and Safety in Health Care
are completely devoted to the issue. Training and residency programs are beginning to include quality and improvement in their
required curricula for medical students. The National Health Service in the United Kingdom has established the Modernisation
Agency, which now has eight hundred employees and massive
improvement agendas, and is in the midst of the largest single-system
improvement effort ever undertaken in any industry. Australia, New
Zealand, and much of Scandinavia have all begun to place improvement of care at the center of their government-sponsored systems.
The World Health Organization now has a chartering policy statement on patient safety from its 2002 World Health Assembly.
The change is preadolescent but massive. These eleven speeches
punctuate a decade of stage setting, a getting-ready-to-change that
in 1992 I could not even have begun to imagine. It would have
seemed crazy even to hope for it.
Eleven National Forum speeches from now, how different will
the message be? Now I can hope even more, without feeling crazy.
The pedal point will be the same, of course: help people—every single person; use knowledge—all the knowledge; work together—
cooperate, above all else. But maybe our hard work on these themes
will at last have paid off so that new themes can also emerge out of
results won, problems solved, and sensemaking returned.
In 2012—twenty years after “Kevin Speaks”—will a National
Forum keynote speaker be fortunate enough to say that millions
upon millions of patients—Kevin’s successors—are safer, in less
pain, more honored in their values and choices, wasting less time
and money, and more confident in the reliability and gentleness of
their care? Will we live longer and die less lonely and less afraid?
Will we be able to celebrate that our health care remembers us in
continuity, through our lives and across our communities, achieving well-being for populations as its measure of success rather than
counting fragments and calling that “productivity”? Will we have
..............
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page xii
replaced nineteenth-century information systems with twenty-firstcentury ones? Will we have restored joy in work for all professionals
and staff, and be unembarrassed to say so? Will our young people,
learning their craft, feel the highest sense of honor and delight in
their choice of profession? Will we have come to think truly globally about the health we seek—for everyone—for all races, for all
regions, for all nations?
Eleven speeches . . . a decade of change . . . a challenge defined
. . . a movement well begun. Now, I’d say, things get really interesting.
September 2003 Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP
Boston, Massachusetts
Preface xiii
.............
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page xiii
fpref.qxd 10/17/03 8:57 AM Page xiv