Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Digital Investigative Journalism
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Data, Visual Analytics
and Innovative Methodologies
in International Reporting
EDITED BY
OLIVER HAHN AND FLORIAN STALPH
D I G I TA L
I N V E S T I G AT I V E
JOURNALISM
Digital Investigative Journalism
Oliver Hahn · Florian Stalph
Editors
Digital Investigative
Journalism
Data, Visual Analytics and Innovative
Methodologies in International Reporting
Editors
Oliver Hahn
Centre for Media and Communication
University of Passau
Passau, Germany
Florian Stalph
Centre for Media and Communication
University of Passau
Passau, Germany
ISBN 978-3-319-97282-4 ISBN 978-3-319-97283-1 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97283-1
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018950725
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and
information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied,
with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affliations.
Cover credit: wektorygrafka
Cover design by Tom Howey
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
v
Contents
1 Digital Investigative Journalism 1
Oliver Hahn and Florian Stalph
Part I Data-Driven Investigation and Computational
Journalism
2 The Rise of Investigative Data Journalism 9
Andrew W. Lehren
3 Zeroes and Ones: Investigating with Data 19
Paul Bradshaw
4 Measuring the Unmeasured with Data 31
Nicolas Kayser-Bril
5 Understanding and Contrasting the Data
and Exploratory News Outlets 43
Felipe De La Hoz
6 Uncovering International Stories with Data
and Collaboration 55
Emilia Díaz-Struck and Mar Cabra
vi Contents
7 Data-Driven Human Rights Investigations 67
Alice Kohli
8 Following the Money Trail: Investigative
Data Journalism 79
Miranda Patrucic
Part II Immersive Storytelling and Visual Investigation
9 Drone Journalism: Storytelling from a New Perspective 91
Ben Kreimer
10 Immersive Journalism: How Virtual Reality Impacts
Investigative Storytelling 103
Marcus Bösch, Stephan Gensch and Linda Rath-Wiggins
11 Visual Storytelling: Show, Not Tell? Show AND Tell 113
Jens Radü
12 Interactivity to the Rescue 123
Johanna Fulda
13 Visual Analysis: Verifcation via Geolocation and
Photographs 137
Eliot Higgins
14 eyeWitness to Atrocities: Verifying Images with Metadata 143
Eleanor Farrow
15 A Matter of Perspective: Truth, Evidence
and the Role of Photography as an Investigative Tool 157
CJ Clarke
16 The Context Verifcation of Digital Photographs 171
Alexander Godulla
Contents vii
17 Photo Manipulation: Software to Unmask Tampering 179
Alessandro Tanasi
Part III Authenticity, Identity and Transparency
18 Fact-Checking as Defence Against Propaganda
in the Digital Age 193
Anna Sarmina
19 Crowdsourced and Patriotic Digital Forensics
in the Ukrainian Confict 203
Aric Toler
20 In-Depth Crisis Reporting 217
Natalia Antelava
21 eJihad: Behind the Use of Social Media by ISIS 229
Asiem El Difraoui with Oliver Hahn
22 Truth Corrupted: The Role of Fact-Based Journalism
in a Post-Truth Society 237
Florian Stalph
23 The Future of Investigative Journalism in an Era
of Surveillance and Digital Privacy Erosion 249
Julie Posetti
Index 263
ix
Notes on Contributors
Natalia Antelava is a co-founder and editor-in-chief of Coda Story.
Marcus Bösch is a journalist, lecturer for mobile reporting, newsgames
and virtual reality and a co-founder of Vragments.
Paul Bradshaw runs the data journalism and multiplatform and mobile
journalism master programmes at the School of Media, Birmingham City
University, UK. He also works as a data journalist with the BBC data
unit.
Mar Cabra is a board member of the Global Editors Network and
member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists
(ICIJ), where she was head of the data and technology team until
September 2017. She is one of the pioneers of data journalism in Spain.
CJ Clarke is an award-winning flm director and photographer. He is
the author of “Magic Party Place”, a ten-year project mapping the rise
of the right and the roots of Brexit. The book was shortlisted for the
Aperture Paris Photo First Book Award.
Felipe De La Hoz is a freelance politics and immigration journalist
based in New York City and writing regularly for the Village Voice and
Gotham Gazette, among others.
Emilia Díaz-Struck is a research editor at the International Consortium
of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).
x Notes on Contributors
Asiem El Difraoui, Ph.D. is a political scientist, economist, and documentary flmmaker. He is also a researcher at the Institut d’études politiques de Paris (Sciences Po), France, and a senior fellow at the Institut
für Medien- und Kommunikationspolitik in Cologne, Germany.
Eleanor Farrow is the Project Coordinator for the eyeWitness to
Atrocities project under the auspices of the International Bar Association
in London.
Johanna Fulda is front-end developer and data visualisation designer
at Cumul8. She was a member of the InfoVis Group at the University of
British Columbia, Canada.
Stephan Gensch is a journalism technologist and head of product
development and a co-founder of Vragments.
Prof. Dr. Alexander Godulla is Professor of Empirical Communication
and Media Research at the University of Leipzig, Germany.
Prof. Dr. Oliver Hahn is Professor of Journalism at the University of
Passau, Germany.
Eliot Higgins is the founder of Bellingcat. He is a visiting research
associate at the King’s College, London, UK, and visiting research fellow
at the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley.
Nicolas Kayser-Bril is a data journalist, and was a co-founder and
manager of Journalism++ from 2011 to 2017, and former head of data
journalism at Owni.
Alice Kohli is a researcher for Public Eye in Switzerland and a former
data journalist at the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
Ben Kreimer is an independent journalism technologist and advisor for the Drone Journalism Lab. He was BuzzFeed’s frst Open Lab
fellow, and has worked with many academic institutions and organisations, including Columbia’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism, USC
Annenberg, CCTV Africa, The Times of India, and the USA TODAY
Network.
Andrew W. Lehren is a senior investigations editor for NBC News, specialising in data journalism. He was a long-time reporter for The New
York Times. He is the director of investigative reporting at the City
University of New York’s Graduate School of Journalism.
Notes on Contributors xi
Miranda Patrucic is an award-winning investigative reporter and regional
editor for the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project
(OCCRP).
Julie Posetti is a multi-award-winning Australian journalist and journalism academic who is a senior research fellow with the Reuters Institute
for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, UK. She is the
author of UNESCO’s Protecting Journalism Sources in the Digital Age.
Jens Radü is a journalist and Head of Multimedia at Der Spiegel.
Linda Rath-Wiggins, Ph.D. is a former Tow-Knight Center fellow
and a co-founder and CEO of Vragments.
Anna Sarmina, Ph.D. is a lecturer at the Taras Shevchenko National
University of Kyiv, specialised in propaganda and information warfare.
Florian Stalph, M.A. is a Research Associate in Journalism at the
University of Passau, Germany.
Alessandro Tanasi is a security researcher and lead developer at Ghiro
Project.
Aric Toler is the lead researcher and trainer for Eastern Europe/Eurasia
at Bellingcat and the Lead Digital Researcher for Eurasia at the Digital
Forensic Research Lab of the Atlantic Council.
xiii
List of Figures
Fig. 11.1 “Der Trump-O-Mat”. The Visual Story about Trump 114
Fig. 11.2 The digital version of Der Spiegel 117
Fig. 11.3 “Rost”. The Visual Story about an Italian steel factory 119
Fig. 13.1 Crowdsourced geolocation via Twitter and Google Street
View 141
Fig. 13.2 Crowdsourced geolocation of advertising sites via Twitter 142
Fig. 16.1 Aspects of context verifcation in press photography 173
1
CHAPTER 1
Digital Investigative Journalism
Oliver Hahn and Florian Stalph
Condensation trails are mainly water-based by-products of aircraft
engines, painting long, cloud-like shapes in the sky. Adding toxic
chemicals—ones that have devastating consequences for our health—
allows weather modifcation, mind control and human population control,
just to name a few options of geoengineering. This theory of so-called
chemtrails is—of course—a hoax. While this might appear as a ludicrous
conspiracy theory, it is a widespread belief. In 2016, the Cooperative
Congressional Election Study, a national study conducted by Harvard
University, found that between “~30 and~40% of the general US public appear to subscribe to versions of the conspiracy theory” (Tingley and
Wagner 2017, p. 5). The study also shows that the biggest part of conversations about chemtrails is conspirative and can predominantly be found
on Twitter.
This episode showcases how emerging disruptive technologies such as the
Internet and particularly social networks channel disinformation and misinformation into the public discourse and infuence the public perception
© The Author(s) 2018
O. Hahn and F. Stalph (eds.), Digital Investigative Journalism,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97283-1_1
O. Hahn (*) · F. Stalph
Centre for Media and Communication, University of Passau,
Passau, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
F. Stalph
e-mail: [email protected]
2 O. HAHN AND F. STALPH
of the world around us. Oftentimes, certain digital spheres are—just like
their inherent messages—driven by partisan allegiance or propagandistic
tendencies. Facilitated through an increasingly fractured post-digital society,
such messages can be deliberately and precisely shared among communities of interest and injected into public communication. An investigation by
Albright (2017), research director at the Tow Center for Digital Journalism
at Columbia Journalism School, has revealed Cambridge Analytica’s effort
to geolocate American voters and combine this information with real-time
emotional sentiment analyses for targeting citizens via social media. Using
that approach, it appears easy to feed relevant information to conspirators
or everyone else, either consolidating their beliefs or shaking their faith.
Such logics of a new ecosystem of information dissemination and consumption require new kinds of tools and new profles of journalists.
Also, the ontology of journalism has changed: New formats and
methods have changed journalists’ everyday work routines that both
emerging professional as well as more experienced reporters have to cope
with. These innovations are accompanied by various challenges: masses
of information provided online and in social media oftentimes leave audiences overnewsed but underinformed. As every piece of information gets
digitised, journalists need to incorporate new practices to access digital
sources, encode new information confgurations and extract meaning
of novel information types. Each kind of information requires specifc
approaches; digital formats can be highly distinct, contain accurate and
detailed information and metadata. Specialists with distinguished skillsets
have always been on the verge of breaking new ground for journalism
innovation. A binary distinction between digital and analogue journalism
is becoming extinct. New emerging technologies of communication are
now an essential part of journalism and expand persistent aspects of a
journalist’s repertoire such as face-to-face communication with sources
and eye-witnesses.
Investigative Journalism is heavily affected by the digital transformation. As the fourth estate, journalists are “quasi-constitutional watchdogs
acting on behalf of a society’s citizens” (Harcup 2014, p. 109). It is arguable whether journalists and affliated news outlets manage to fulfl this role,
acting as lapdogs not watchdogs (Benjamin 2014). Certainly, investigative
journalism demands a lot from journalists: In order to uncover corruption,
mismanagement, abuse of power or shady money operations and fraud,
journalists are likely to stir up a hornet’s nest bearing risks for their career,
their whole profession and their own safety. By its very nature, investigative
1 DIGITAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM 3
reporters encounter resistance as they are trying to reinstate transparency
and balance for the public good and according to democratic values. This
is by no means desirable by those who are investigated. As a result, journalists face obstacles and forces they have to fercely overcome. Powers that
normally fght those who try to unmask them, may be hiding behind institutions, creeping in governmental bodies, exploiting loopholes and sailing
close to the wind, or running sophisticated cons. Hence, citizens are in dire
need of advocates who call out these wrongdoings. Accordingly, sources
holding incriminating evidence are hard to access. Only few organisations
may be willing to publish or to provide such evidence; usually, such information is well kept behind closed doors.
The digitisation of information—be it proceedings, contracts, annual
reports, demographic statistics, economic indicators or audiovisual
material—bears enormous implications for investigative journalism. On
the one hand, journalists are now equipped with new tools that allow
them to run analyses of high computational efforts, work statistical
analyses and present their fndings with a high visual appeal to broad
audiences via the Internet. On the other hand, digital information is
encryptable, decentralised and extremely prone to manipulation and
tampering. To keep up with these challenges, journalists from both legacy media as well as independent activist platforms developed software,
techniques and mindsets to prolong investigative shoe-leather reporting
in the digital era.
In 2010, The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel
reported on the Afghan War documents leak unveiling unknown facts
hidden in numbers. The publication of these reports can be regarded
as the ascent of data journalism or, at least, as its inauguration into the
repertoires of reputable media outlets. Until then, data journalism had
been a niche phenomenon we could scarcely observe in mainstream
media. However, evolving internet technologies initiated the emergence
of easy-to-use and mostly free tools to refne, analyse and visualise
statistical data, which—due to the ongoing digitalisation of information
in the past decades—would provide a new and seemingly inexhaustible
source for journalists.
An online survey by Garrison (2001) revealed that internet technologies such as search engines and database services made their way into US
newsrooms, showing that the Internet has been becoming a dominant
source for news collection since the late 1990s. Later, Holovaty (2006)
published a manifesto for database journalism. He calls on newspapers
4 O. HAHN AND F. STALPH
“to stop the story-centric worldview” and to embrace data in their
stories postulating news stories built around data-driven interfaces with
regard for a combination of both text and data.
Today, data journalism can very well be considered as incorporated
into the editorial structures of legacy news outlets such as The Guardian
or The New York Times and we see more and more small data units on
a local and regional level. Furthermore, thanks to the mere existence of
stand-alone data-driven explanatory and analytical data journalism sites
such as Vox, FiveThirtyEight or Quartz, and thanks to the inclusion of
data journalism within journalism education and the growing consideration by the scientifc community, data journalism is no more on the
fringes but a well-known and widely discussed journalistic phenomenon.
Data journalism is symptomatic for the data age: Journalists need tools
to report information that is now saved in digital forms. But not only
words and statements are abstracted and are turned into spreadsheets,
and not only demographic or economic statistics are stored as intelligible
datasets. Audiovisual materials such as photographs and videos are other
information mediums that challenge digital journalism. It is particularly
diffcult to authenticate visual and audiovisual material and to identify the
originators of those contents. How can journalists retrieve data, pictures
and voices that can enlighten stories, provide background information
or will result in exclusive scoops? Data-driven journalism and its techniques of analysing and visualising statistical big data and new visual-analytical tools are cutting-edge approaches to uncover the truth and tell
the story behind the story; whereas the former has found its way into
most newsrooms, visual analytics techniques are predominantly applied
by independent specialists, experts working for independent platforms or
institutions affliated with academia. This edited volume displays various
approaches, technologies and projects that employ innovative practices
within their investigations. By no means does this outset imply that new
technologies and practices for investigative newsgathering replace traditional techniques and make investigations exclusively desk-bound; however, new approaches certainly do enhance access to a variety of unique
sources and voices.
This book compiles chapters by both practitioners and academics.
Contributions range from engaging anecdotes or authoritative instructions to contextualised discussions. As a result, chapters differ regarding
their format and intent. If you are a practitioner yourself, some chapters hopefully prove to be useful hands-on manuals while other chapters