Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

Development of professional roles in the practice of public relations in Chile
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Public Relations Review 38 (2012) 446–453
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Public Relations Review
Development of professional roles in the practice of public relations in
Chile
Claudia Mellado∗, Sergio Barría
School of Journalism, University of Santiago (Chile), Av. Ecuador 3650, Estación Central, Santiago de Chile, Chile
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 3 December 2011
Received in revised form 29 March 2012
Accepted 4 April 2012
Keywords:
Public relations
Public relations practitioners
Professional roles
Role conceptions
Chile
a b s t r a c t
Using survey responses of 577 public relation practitioners, this article examines role conceptions in Chilean public relations, as well as the effects that different individual and
organizational factors have on their professional worldviews. The results show that how
Chilean practitioners perceive their roles can be grouped into four different types: the longterm strategic,the short-term technical,the passive-complaisant, and the active-vigilant. In
general terms, Chilean public relations practitioners distance themselves from the passivecomplaisant role, giving greater importance to the other three. The findings also reveal that
gender, education level, job commitment, perceived autonomy, organization type, and geographical location are the factors that better predict Chilean PR professional roles, while
hierarchy level and organization’s reach do not directly affect their perceptions.
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Since modern public relations education was established, researchers have tried to identify the functions and roles of
the profession within the communication field. The profound political, economic, and social changes that have been rapidly
occurring during the last decades around the world, especially in emerging and transitioning democracies and economies
(Moreno, Molleda, & Suárez, 2006), have intensified this search of identity in a more and more complex, competitive, and
globalized environment. The decrease in the State’s power, the importance given to public opinion, the centrality of mass
media, the organizations’ exposure to social scrutiny, the increased process of competition, the expansion of the society of
consumers, and the multiplication of conflicts and crisis are some of the aspects involved in these changes (Tironi & Cavallo,
2004).
Professional roles in public relations, also known as professional orientations or professional worldviews, have been
analyzed by the literature as the normative and real functions ofthe public relations practice that guide individuals’ behavior
within the organizational context(Costa, 2005;Molleda & Ferguson, 2004;VanRuler,Verciˇ c, ˇ Flodin, & Buetschi, 2001; Zerfass,
Tench, Verhoeven, Verciˇ c, ˇ & Moreno, 2010).
The abundant research on PR professional roles developed in the US and Europe contrasts with the little theoretical and
empirical work that exists on the topic in Latin America. Although previous efforts have been carried out in some countries
of the region (González & Akel, 1996; Molleda, 2001; Molleda & Ferguson, 2004; Molleda, Moreno, Athaydes, & Suárez, 2010;
Simões, 1992), Western cultural influences on the Southern Hemisphere have strongly impacted the dominant approach
through which the profession’s role and function have been conceived (Sharpe & Simoes, 1996).
In Chile, the few studies focused on public relations are mostly concerned with descriptive aspects of the job market, demographic characterization, public relation’s history, and the study of protocol and etiquette in event organization
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +56 2 7184420.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Mellado), [email protected] (S. Barría).
0363-8111/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.04.001