Thư viện tri thức trực tuyến
Kho tài liệu với 50,000+ tài liệu học thuật
© 2023 Siêu thị PDF - Kho tài liệu học thuật hàng đầu Việt Nam

A comparative analysis of the perception of public relations in Chinese and South Korean newspapers
Nội dung xem thử
Mô tả chi tiết
Please cite this article in press as: Jo, S., & Yoo, J.-W. A comparative analysis of the perception of public relations in Chinese
and South Korean newspapers. Public Relations Review (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.010
ARTICLE IN PRESS G Model
PUBREL-1242; No. of Pages3
Public Relations Review xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Public Relations Review
Research in Brief
A comparative analysis of the perception of public relations
in Chinese and South Korean newspapers,
Samsup Joa,∗, Jae-Woong Yoo b
a Department of Public Relations & Advertising, Sookmyung Women’s University, 100 Cheongpa-ro 47-Gil, Yongsang-Gu, Seoul 140-742,
South Korea b Department of Public Relations and Design, Eulji University, 553 Sanseong-Daero, Sujeong-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-Do 461-632,
South Korea
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 August 2013
Received in revised form 17 January 2014
Accepted 29 January 2014
Keywords:
Xuan Chuan
Hong-Bo
Chinese newspaper
Korean newspaper
Public relations terms
a b s t r a c t
The study analyzes the major newspapers of China and South Korea to explore how the
journalists perceive public relations term which is equivalent to Xuan Chuan in China and
Hong-Bo in South Korea. Chinese news considered the primary function of Xuan Chuan to
be persuasion, whereas Korean news considered the primary functions of Hong-Bo to be
public information and image (reputation) management. Xuan Chuan was more likely to be
associated with the government and persuasion, whereas Hong Bo was closely associated
with for-profit organizations and image management.
© 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction
The perception of public relations in the media has endured as a topic of study (Pincus, Rimmer, Rayfield, & Cropp, 1993;
Scrimger & Richards, 2003; Sterne, 2010). Despite the expansion and classification of the targets and boundaries of public
relations research, most studies have focused on Western nations, including the United States. However, applying research
that targets Western populations to the nations of the East is difficult because socio-cultural environments are distinct.
Though China and South Korea are geographically adjacent to each other and have long shared not only Confucian
customs and traditions but also linguistic features, the two nations now have different political and socio-cultural systems.
In spite of new definition of public relations unveiled by the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA, 2012), there still
exists a substantial perceptual gap between the academic definition and actual practice. This nature of perceptual gap needs
to be examined across different cultures as well. This study contributes to public relations knowledge by examining how
traditional perceptions have evolved and by identifying where the practice and perception of public relations diverges from
normative academic definitions.
The complete study can be requested from the author.
The research was supported by the Sookmyung Women’s University Research Grants 2012.
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 710 9377; fax: +82 2 2077 7943.
E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (S. Jo), [email protected] (J.-W. Yoo).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.010
0363-8111/© 2014Elsevier Inc.All rights reserved.